Do you think he should’ve just drawn on the kid rather than try to dive on him? Seems in the state the shooter was in he would’ve shot him if he had pulled his weapon, not surrendered. Should he have just shot him while he was down? What was tactically the best option? And legally?

I’m not sure whether it’s a weakness or a strength that for someone on the left, the non-lethal option was what he went for. You just know any CHUD would’ve shot first asked questions later, as proven by the fash baby.

  • OptimusPrimeRib [none/use name]
    6·
    4 years ago

    Yes I think he should have shot him.

    Yes it's a very bad sign for the left that in response to getting shot people would rather die trying to disarm him because he is a year away from 18. I also heard he didn't have a round already in the chamber.

    All of that in my opinion is the absolute definition of larping. We need to take a good long hard look at ourselves right now.