Literally the first sentence of the (CIA)wikipedia article on it:
On 19 March 2011, a multi-state NATO-led coalition began a military intervention in Libya, to implement United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, in response to events during the First Libyan Civil War.
Oh so its just liberal mysticism of magically divorcing the alliance of countries from the countries themselves, that its somehow more virtuous than the sum of its parts?
![[CW: Vaush] There is no mask.](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/bBrgFiTWNe.jpg){kind=link}
okay vaush, what the fuck was libya then :pain:
deleted by creator
:agony-deep:
Yes because the coordination and frameworks that NATO creates dont have wider implications for geopolitics in general... fuckin brainlet.
You see organisations are just the sum of their members, except when they arent, which is why they are better than the sum of their members. Yes.
Literally the first sentence of the (CIA)wikipedia article on it:
On 19 March 2011, a multi-state NATO-led coalition began a military intervention in Libya, to implement United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973, in response to events during the First Libyan Civil War.
Oh so its just liberal mysticism of magically divorcing the alliance of countries from the countries themselves, that its somehow more virtuous than the sum of its parts?
Right, like how its not a police death squad because the pigs were off duty when they did the killing
qaddafi was a tankie and thus nato's intervention was good and just
:gaddafi-happy: :josus-stalin: