A 1956 agreement that allowed British boats to fish in the Barents Sea has been ripped up, in the latest sign of growing tensions between Moscow and the West.
The fishing deal was signed by Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev, but Russian politicians have now claimed it was never in the national interest.
...
Russia's parliamentary speaker Vyacheslav Volodin said: "The British need to study some proverbs - 'Russians harness the horse slowly, but ride it fast'."
He told politicians that "the unscrupulous British" had eaten Russian fish for 68 years - declaring: "Now let them lose weight, get smarter."
Country with no warm water ports say what?
breaking: liberal DESTROYS sevastopol through sheer force of will
A meme that will only look sillier as climate change gets worse
This guy doesn't understand climate change lol
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-53308-5
seasonal considerations
A nice way of saying with warmer climates weather becomes more intense and less predictable.
The artic north sea route also isn't what prevents them from using the port the entire year. It freezes, it will continue to freeze especially with the harsher cold snaps the globe faces.
Again you don't seem to understand climate change it is not "lol planet gets hot teehee"
When you have a deep understanding of the issue
No, the likely scenario is that maximal ice coverage will (continue to) recede noticeably.
Lol okay you're right Russia is immune to climate change. St. Petersburg definitely isn't having flooding issues and Vladivostok didn't get smashed by a freak ice storm that other places across the globe have also been smashed by
None of that happened I guess climate change isn't a problem
We're talking about ports icing over, which will happen less as global temperatures rise. Bringing up other climate change problems (that are far from unique to Russia) does not change that.
you know westoids get flooded way worse than russia right
their most populous area is literally 10 ft above sea level, for the entire country
Also like, Britain is islands and Russia is the largest country in the world. Who do you think is better equipped to handle rising sea levels? I know which has a LOOOOOT more inland.
Okay? St Petersburg has an issue with flooding. I don't know what you're trying to convince me of lmfao it's just the truth.
It is also the truth that Vladivostok got hit by a freak ice storm and their port freezes about 4 months out of the year.
Russia has always had struggles with ports. Climate change won't save them and will actively harm them like everyone else. Climate change also is not flat warming, that's what stupid people believe.
Why are you so insecure about those facts??
So you believe in a literal sense all the maps drawn in the west that still call Crimea a part of Ukraine?
And you believe the actual verifiable lies told by Russia for the whole affair? Moron
please tell me what I believe
Apparently a bunch of bullshit if you believe what you said lol
And what did I say? That Russia holds Crimea?
That's objectively true. Are you suffering delusions?
Sevastopol belongs to Ukraine.
Crimea belongs to Ukraine.
What the fuck are you talking about
So yes you are completely delusional
t
Yes. Because it is.
lol just say whatever you want
Imagine being so stupid lol
elaborate
you = dumb
is an equal sign too difficult for you to understand?
I'm not the one acting like a schoolchild
Yes you are though as schoolchildren are dumb and often need to be educated.
You are dumb and seem to need an education. So thus "schoolchild"