Someone applying for 90K to gamble should have been denied a loan and to be honest I don't even hold that person a little bit responsible that their obviously dumbass plan wasn't questioned or denied by the bank which should be responsible for lending money in such a way they get it back
Wouldn't it be great where if a bank made a bad loan a judge would take out a comedically large stamp and stamp "doofus" on their face and you can just shrug because they're the ones who took the risk?
Realistically it’s the son sitting there because Robinhood makes it easy and addictive to drop $90k borrowed from the bank on a bazinga stock
I blame the bank for that situation.
Someone applying for 90K to gamble should have been denied a loan and to be honest I don't even hold that person a little bit responsible that their obviously dumbass plan wasn't questioned or denied by the bank which should be responsible for lending money in such a way they get it back
Wouldn't it be great where if a bank made a bad loan a judge would take out a comedically large stamp and stamp "doofus" on their face and you can just shrug because they're the ones who took the risk?