Edit: looks like HexbearHater got banned. Shoutout to ThatOneCalculator, who posted too close to the sun on main and had their account deleted

  • BynarsAreOk [none/use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I agree with this but I am not even sure it is a bad thing it is public, I can't really see a good argument why drafting legislation needs to be secret unless I'm missing something obvious here.

    The only assumption is that maybe public attention would affect the process but isn't that the point of "democracy"?

    • Llituro [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Doing it for something intrinsically stupid like this reinforces the norm that we don't expect to be able to freely comment on legislation as it's developed.

    • Chapo_is_Red [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      Haven't thought about this much, but I suspect using git there's a similar problem that occurs in other public areas:

      The cranks with the most free time could be the loudest voice and exercise outsized influence against the public interest. This is what happens in municipal councils all the time.

    • ZWQbpkzl [none/use name]
      ·
      3 years ago

      The only problem with drafting it publicly is its open to sabotage, as seen here.