I’m asking this somewhat weird question because I found a nexus collection built upon loverslab stuff with like 200 unrelated mods that are awesome together. It’s amazing until I encounter any of the sex stuff. Dongs of Skyrim is just funny af and I don’t count it. The physics alone lmao.

Mostly though, it’s male gazey, objectifying (every woman is a potential partner and an install option allows the user to have guaranteed suave charm that can’t fail), BUT it’s all optional and if the creator hadn’t merged a bunch of stuff to get past some technical hard mod limits and conflicts I would be able to remove them. Outside the sex stuff, it’s deeply immersive and atmospheric. I just, feel bad, every time I realize that yes I’m playing a mod pack for fetishists that turn every npc into a potential sex slave. Its…. Gross.

I don’t know, I guess I’m asking what thoughts are on the game equivalent of separating art from artist in terms of avoidable mechanics that provide a problematic tint to the whole thing nonetheless. It’s hardly a pressing moral Issue, but it made me curious to see if anyone here had thoughts on the whole thing.

  • Diogenes_Barrel [love/loves]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    wtf is a "Mod Pack" you sicko

    install your own mods like an adult, this is the most disgusting post ive ever seen

    • GriddlePill [none/use name]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah sure, because everyone is an unemployed lumpen with the free time to learn how to merge 300 mods

    • GriddlePill [none/use name]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yes because everyone has the time to learn how to merge mod files to avoid the hard limit. Some of us are actual proles with jobs. I don’t have the time for that

      • Diogenes_Barrel [love/loves]
        ·
        2 years ago

        i was just tryna be cheeky but

        respectfully, you're the one who made a post about being uncomfortable with the shit you did have the time to install. you shouldn't have if you don't like it. :wonder-who-thats-for: