It may be part of a desire to normalize their icky opinions. They are looking for the people in the audience who says: "hey , i agree with you." It's kind of a running theme with pedos.
I'm no psychologist but i suspect people like these find unbearable shame in their needs and this causes them to seek some form of validation, either grouping together to validate each other or over rationalizing "hot takes" like these to seek some sort of approval from the general public.
What? The Overton Window a real thing that exists.
It describes how politicians (and by extension, the PMC) view electoralism and policy: "What position could I take that maximizes profit/support while minimizing dissent?" It's Centrism 101, and it's how these ghouls operate. It's important to understand how they think. It's wrong—because fuck electoralism—but that's what they believe. And it's not surprising that cardboard leftists like Vaush are on board with trying to shift public opinion that way.
It may be part of a desire to normalize their icky opinions. They are looking for the people in the audience who says: "hey , i agree with you." It's kind of a running theme with pedos.
I'm no psychologist but i suspect people like these find unbearable shame in their needs and this causes them to seek some form of validation, either grouping together to validate each other or over rationalizing "hot takes" like these to seek some sort of approval from the general public.
100% this. Shifting the Overton Window, but for pedos
learn Marxism
What? The Overton Window a real thing that exists.
It describes how politicians (and by extension, the PMC) view electoralism and policy: "What position could I take that maximizes profit/support while minimizing dissent?" It's Centrism 101, and it's how these ghouls operate. It's important to understand how they think. It's wrong—because fuck electoralism—but that's what they believe. And it's not surprising that cardboard leftists like Vaush are on board with trying to shift public opinion that way.