• Tankie_super_PAC [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I'm prey sure that such a system is more expensive than whatever the costs of vandalism might be. Also this feels like a way to scare trans kids.

    • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It's not like there's a longstanding track record where we use one 'crises' as an excuse to broaden the state surveillance apparatus

      Also these fucking things apparently could cost north of a couple k per DOOR

      Looking around, the lowest I could find per door was like $1,200 or so...what kind of vandalism are you having where this is more cost effective lmao?

      • AmericaDelendeEst [any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        can't wait until they all get broken, you know, by vandalism, and then nobody can get in to take a shit

        • SacredExcrement [any, comrade/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Looking forward to them installing security cameras everywhere and hiring a bunch of pigs to monitor them to 'protect their investment'

        • JuneFall [none/use name]
          ·
          2 years ago

          When I was young my school tried the policy to lock all toilets. You had to get a key for it and there you would also get 1 roll of toilet paper.

          Was absolutely mad.

      • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don't even think this is about surveillance. You're already a registered student in a school full of cameras moving between classes that take daily attendance. Who the fuck is even going to be checking these log files? It just looks like an excuse to piss money away on a non-problem for the benefit of some chud with a finger-print scanner installation business.

    • TheSpectreOfGay [he/him, she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      ya my first thought was that this was to scare trans kids not for stopping vandalism or whatever :thinking-about-it: