I know a lot of people who do art for a living. They are basically treated like shit by capitalism. Nobody respects how much time, effort and training goes into art. Art is fucking hard. You get paid next to nothing for it.

Unless you sell your soul to work in advertising/marketing. Then you get paid only slightly more than nothing. You are also now expected to churn out a fuckton of art each day if you want to keep your job. Enjoy watching everything unique, creative and special be sucked out of your art by higher-ups that demand safe, soulless corporate art. Enjoy being told you're expendable and easily replaced so you work an extra 5 hours unpaid that night. Working conditions in some advertising agencies are close to resembling sweatshops with how they exploit their junior artists in particular. I knew someone that used to work 7 days a week, even though they weren't paid on weekends. They worked until midnight (unpaid overtime) only to start again at 8am the next day again. That's how 'competitive' the industry is. They eventually had a nervous breakdown and changed careers.

Art being some bourgeoise thing where a beret-wearing snob sells a photo of piss for 5 trillion dollars is not the norm (as funny as that would be). The norm is backbreaking work for very little in return, like every other job title that isn't CEO, Manager, or Landlord.

So yeah, even though I'm fascinated by AI art and don't think it would necessarily be a bad thing if it was being used in a socialist setting, I think artists have every right to be upset that tech bros are finding a way to suck even more life out of art.

In short, creatives get treated like shit. Thinking art isn't real work is chud-level shit.

  • hahafuck [they/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    "Do art" is too broad a category to be meaningful. Also don't take shots at my piss photo exhibit that represents literally years worth of work (piss)

    • BolsheWitch [she/her, they/them]
      cake
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      “Do art” is too broad a category to be meaningful

      what is a category you would find narrow enough to be meaningful? what inferences can you make about the author’s intended meaning of “do art” based on contextual clues in the rest of the post? please write 150-300 words and include proper citations in MLA formatting.

      • Diogenes_Barrel [love/loves]
        ·
        2 years ago

        MLA formatting

        :gulag: Posts by the Chicago Gang

        but uh it is a bit broad, because owners and bosses can be involved in creative processes and clearly don't have the same conditions & stakes as their employees. "Proles 'doing art', as their primary job" would probably be the most unambiguous way to put it. So like a director or producer, while involved in creative decisions, their primary job is organization of artists and managing/owning capital