• JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
    ·
    5 months ago

    I'm surprised that other people are surprised that for-profit companies constantly try to increase their profits; such companies only contribute to FOSS when that's more profitable than the alternative. The Linux kernel, AMDGPU, Steam, etc only exist because some part of the software/hardware stack is proprietary (which becomes a more attractive product as the FOSS portion of the stack improves).

    I'm definitely not justifying the "rug-pulling", but people need to stop supporting projects with no potential for long-term profitability unless those projects can survive without any support from for-profit companies. Anything else is destined to fail.

    • Nakoichi [he/him]
      ·
      5 months ago

      people need to stop supporting projects with no potential for long-term profitability unless those projects can survive without any support from for-profit companies.

      You see the contradiction here right?

        • Nakoichi [he/him]
          ·
          5 months ago

          Open source projects have no potential for long term profitability unless those projects get support from for profit companies, thus compromising the nature of open source.

          • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
            ·
            5 months ago

            Not all FOSS projects need to be profitable to survive. IOW if a project cannot survive without being profitable and it cannot be profitable long-term, then it cannot survive long-term.