jackmarxist [any] to chapotraphouse • 3 months ago289% Inflation lmaoimagemessage-square49 fedilinkarrow-up1214
arrow-up1214image289% Inflation lmaojackmarxist [any] to chapotraphouse • 3 months agomessage-square49 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareOwl [he/him]hexbear2·3 months agoHah, yeah. But on a real-world data set, even if the underlying phenomenon is e^x, you'll keep amplifying sample noise until the derivatives are basically random. Assuming you even have enough data to keep taking derivatives. link
Hah, yeah.
But on a real-world data set, even if the underlying phenomenon is e^x, you'll keep amplifying sample noise until the derivatives are basically random. Assuming you even have enough data to keep taking derivatives.