If I point them out and make sure to point out that I fo not hold them, people will argue I do not understand them well.
I understood that you believe in the continuity and perseverance of humanity and triumph over climate induced cataclysm.
And yet your second paragraph you described yourself as a doomer in your first sentence. Then comes a description of the general vibes of annihilation and impending collapse.
When I or others read "doomer", they do so with the knowledge that doomers believe that life is projecting toward an inevitable and imminent collapse and therefore find comfort in hedonism or resignation. Until I read your last paragraph did I know your position.
The root of my contention in general is that you placed more emphasis on the demise of the human species than on its salvation and persistence - to which you gave half a sentence in a bullet point to - and in much greater detail.
I understood that you believe in the continuity and perseverance of humanity and triumph over climate induced cataclysm.
And yet your second paragraph you described yourself as a doomer in your first sentence. Then comes a description of the general vibes of annihilation and impending collapse.
When I or others read "doomer", they do so with the knowledge that doomers believe that life is projecting toward an inevitable and imminent collapse and therefore find comfort in hedonism or resignation. Until I read your last paragraph did I know your position.
The root of my contention in general is that you placed more emphasis on the demise of the human species than on its salvation and persistence - to which you gave half a sentence in a bullet point to - and in much greater detail.
Which is why I felt compelled to summarize.