From the same news outlet that Oppenheimer himself subscribed to.

  • happybadger [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Viewers will note the attention to detail during the film's climax as Oppenheimer (Cillian Murphy) announces, "It's bomb time".

    • SorosFootSoldier [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      During the opening sequence Oppenheimer (Cillian Murphy) comically brushes his teeth in the mirror while the radio plays "You dropped a bomb on me" by the gap band, he then goes on to make breakfast via a rube goldberg style machine to highlight his genius.

      • happybadger [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        ppenheimer (Cillian Murphy) turns toward his assistant and, in the glow of the bomb, sarcastically says "Well that just happened."

          • happybadger [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            oment of dramatic tension, Oppenheimer (Cillian Murphy) turns to President Truman (Gary Oldman) and says "Japanese people are really startin' to pISS ME OFF AFTER ALL THIS PEARL HARBOUR CRAP"

            • UlyssesT
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              deleted by creator

          • mazdak
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

    • Fuckass
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Edward Teller post-credits scene

        Thermonuclear ICBM exploded universe

        • mazdak
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

    • Fuckass
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      He didn't want the bomb dropped on civilians, only on military targets from what I remember of grade 10 history. Though he was on the targeting team, so he would've known that it would be dropped on civilians.

      • ElHexo
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • Nacarbac [any]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Thanks for the link - ugly reading.

          That particular paragraph was certainly a carefully crafted bit of weasel wording, I agree the only interpretation that makes real sense is (to repeat what you just said) that they don't wish to "lose" the weapon in the sense of wasting its kill zone so that a small military target (which means basically any military target given the blast radius) needs a larger civilian target to die with it.

          The concern clearly wasn't a dud bomb (and they believed one of the bombs would probably detonate anyway from groundwater) because those considerations aren't even mentioned and they move swiftly on.

          Very practical and cool.

          Came across an interesting article (with some interesting speculation) about why Kyoto was taken off the list.

    • ElHexo
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      deleted by creator

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I don't think he did that, though he is certainly partly to blame for it happening.

        • quarrk [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Is there an excerpt you are referring to? It’s interesting but there is a lot to read there

            • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I read document 12 and it says that Dr Conat suggested the target and made said recommendation to the Secretary, and that there was a "general agreement... That we could not concentrate on a civilian area; but that we should seek to make a profound psychological impression on as many of the inhabitants as possible ".

              So it was Dr Conant that advocated directly for that specific target, not Dr Oppenheimer. Oppenheimer however advocated for the biggest possible spectacle, and even multiple simultaneous nuclear bombings, according to document 12. Which is probably worse.

  • quarrk [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Gonna go see it this weekend. If I don’t survive the blast, you all can have my keyboard, it’s never lost an argument

  • culpritus [any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    So Nolan made a film about Red Scare cancel culture it seems. Maybe Nolan-heads will become anti-Red-Scare contrarians now?

      • Goblinmancer [any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Apparently people in Phillipines and Indonesia clapped after watching oppenheimer. Then again a lot of them believe america liberated asia by nuking japan, nevermind how much suffering came from american backed faacists such as marcos and suharto

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        deleted by creator

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • VILenin [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m so fucking tired of films where it’s just dipshit commits genocide but he feels sad so he’s the real victim, and this makes it deep and contemplative somehow.

      To make a deep film you need to actually explore the dynamics instead of going “is genocide good or bad? no one really knows shrug-outta-hecks” nuancebro shit

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        deleted by creator

      • mazdak
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

  • Cherufe [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Im ready for Oppenheimer to become the 'literally me' character of online leftists with poor media literacy like Patrick Bateman is for sigma males

    I mean I dont think it will happen but I think it would be funny