• xiaoping_showdown [he/him]
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 years ago

    Is there any part of this article in particular you care to defend? Because as far as I can tell, it is definitely anprim, and definitely has a lot of bullshit in it.

    • xiaoping_showdown [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      I want to add that I am not saying there is nothing of value in the piece. There is historical information of value because it is very common for proponents of a political system to downplay or ignore negative aspects of that system.

      What I am saying is that we are in a leftist (largely Marxist) space, and discussing an anti-industrial, anti-intellectual, and utopian set of ideas. So what attitude do you expect to see other than dismissal?

      • Divine_Chaos100 [none/use name]
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        4 years ago

        I mean i expected nothing less from internet ML's than outright disrespect for other people's autonomy.

        • mao [he/him]
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          deleted by creator

          • Divine_Chaos100 [none/use name]
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 years ago

            So you think the Wet'suwet'en are fighting for their private property? What about Standing Rock? The defacement of Mt. Rushmore was merely an infraction on others' private property? Don't be ridiculous.

            • mao [he/him]
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              deleted by creator