• sempersigh [he/him]
    ·
    4 months ago

    She literally had to change her response the next time it happened because she (probably some advisor) realized it was terrible but the hive literally wants us to remember it because they think it ruled lmao

    • miz [any, any]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      anywhere I can read more, I hadn't heard she got interrupted by protestors again and am wondering what her changed response was

      • sempersigh [he/him]
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is it I think https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDSxEus65gM

        • miz [any, any]
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          we hear you, we see you, we support a ceasefire (and by that we mean the IOF goes right back into Gaza once the settler prisoners are freed or never leaves the Philadelphi Corridor at all). yeah this is much better in the sense that it is boring as shit and harder to mock

          • sempersigh [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            It only looks good because of how god awful the last one was

          • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
            ·
            4 months ago

            Its not genuinly better in making me support or want to vote for her because i see through it like you do, but it is genuinly better at political messaging. Especially combined with the whole "meeting with Uncommited" thing they did.

            The fact that they changed courses her is, to me, another sign of what I've been saying, that it looks like they genuinly want to win. "I'm speaking" was the first like "oh theres the losers I know" since Biden stepped down. And now they're backing down from it. Of course unhigned morons like King aren't lol, but the campaign is!