Original post here: https://hexbear.net/post/3856299?scrollToComments=false

I think we have a general path forward based on community feedback. "We see you, we hear you!"

I went ahead and unpinned the old post. I'm pinning this one for now and will edit this post when I wake up from eepy time. I had a very mid week and have no particular alarm set so be on look out. Love y'all and I'm amped for my first announcement post since coming back. :)

      • Esoteir [he/him]
        ·
        17 days ago

        so it's not functionally the same in all senses?

        • replaceable [he/him]
          ·
          17 days ago

          thats what functionally same means, that its not literally same

          • Esoteir [he/him]
            ·
            17 days ago

            okay so if you're going into semantics, can we agree that the term "functionally the same" means two things that have the same function?

              • Esoteir [he/him]
                ·
                17 days ago

                okay cool, now could users perform the function of dunking people who weren't public figures on the_dunk_tank?

                  • Esoteir [he/him]
                    ·
                    17 days ago

                    does rule 8 contain this text: "Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this."?

                    • replaceable [he/him]
                      ·
                      17 days ago

                      yes, but we barely if ever saw any posts that used this exception

                      • Esoteir [he/him]
                        ·
                        17 days ago

                        But under that exception, it would be allowed for someone to post a bad take from comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views yes?

                          • Esoteir [he/him]
                            ·
                            17 days ago

                            okay, with that exception in mind, could users perform the function of dunking people who weren't public figures on the_dunk_tank?

                              • Esoteir [he/him]
                                ·
                                17 days ago

                                and the_dunk_tank and c/gossip have the same rules, aside from rule 8 where it now also links to counterpropaganda, correct?

                                • replaceable [he/him]
                                  ·
                                  17 days ago

                                  Those were inattentively copied from the_dunk_tank, i removed reference to that rule 8 in c/gossip now, now instead the rule is just that subjects of a post must be a public person

                                  • Esoteir [he/him]
                                    ·
                                    17 days ago

                                    ah gotcha, it's good to set the rules up clearly

                                    so now there is no exception for posting private figures on c/gossip, right?

                                      • Esoteir [he/him]
                                        ·
                                        17 days ago

                                        and the_dunk_tank held the function of providing a place where users could post a bad take from comments/posts made by a private person that have low amounts of upvotes/likes/views, provided that private person made that post or comment on other instances that are accessible from hexbear, yes?