sawne128 [he/him] to electoralism • 2 months agoAs votes are being counted, De la Cruz overtakes Oliver in the California presidential election.imagemessage-square46 fedilinkarrow-up1144
arrow-up1144imageAs votes are being counted, De la Cruz overtakes Oliver in the California presidential election.sawne128 [he/him] to electoralism • 2 months agomessage-square46 Commentsfedilink
minus-squarenandos_house_of_glues [she/her]hexbear61·2 months agothey rightfully feared what would happen if white people saw PSL as an option (they love pumpkin spice) link
minus-squareHumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]hexbear19·2 months agoi mean more likely the PSL registered her campaign as independent because the barrier for registering as a political party is higher link
minus-squaremiz [any, any]hexbear13·edit-22 months agoshe was listed PSL on the California ballot link
minus-squareCleverOleg [he/him]hexbear28·2 months agoTechnically she was on the Peace and Freedom Party, not the same org but they have ballot access in CA so they accepted de la Cruz as their candidate. Still, it should at least be PAF or something. link
minus-squareTrashGoblin [he/him, they/them]hexbear4·2 months agoHere in [Southern State], de la Cruz was on the ballot on the [Southern State] Workers' Party. You do what you have to for ballot access. link
bourgeois state put IND instead of PSL
they rightfully feared what would happen if white people saw PSL as an option (they love pumpkin spice)
i mean more likely the PSL registered her campaign as independent because the barrier for registering as a political party is higher
she was listed PSL on the California ballot
Technically she was on the Peace and Freedom Party, not the same org but they have ballot access in CA so they accepted de la Cruz as their candidate. Still, it should at least be PAF or something.
ah okay. I knew she wasn't listed independent
Here in [Southern State], de la Cruz was on the ballot on the [Southern State] Workers' Party. You do what you have to for ballot access.