• copandballtorture [ey/em]
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that the invisible president even registers on the approval scale is an accomplishment

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If he's invisible what the fuck is Kamala Harris by comparison? top-cop

      I think she does more as our running joke chief of the VolCel Police than she does as vice president. volcel-judge bunny-cop volcel-kamala volcel-judge

    • duderium [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s amazing that days will pass without any corporate press outlet mentioning Biden on the front page. Even Fox News refrains from mentioning him.

    • IHaveTwoCows@lemm.ee
      ·
      1 year ago

      An invisible President is what you want. I only want him visible when abolishing lobbyists and punching down Nazis. Also fining the shit out of lying fascist pundits and fake news vendors. Outside of that I dont need to hear from a President every day.

      • brain_in_a_box [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        A president who did that would be incredibly visible. Certainly Biden isn't.

      • papertowels@lemmy.one
        ·
        1 year ago

        It's so refreshing not waking up to new presidential news every day. What the president does has very little effect on your day to day life, politics shouldn't be mixed up with entertainment.

        I'd happily take a boring president over the last administration... a day that the POTUS isn't reduced to a dried bean salesman is a good day in my book.

        • btbt [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “Why are all of these proles complaining about getting crushed by the prole crushing machine? Don’t they realize I’m trying to eat brunch? Why can’t they just be happy with getting slaughtered by the status quo so that people like me don’t have to think about anything unpleasant?”

          • papertowels@lemmy.one
            ·
            1 year ago

            Cute. Presidents making the news every day doesn't mean they're helping the common folk, but keep making your assumptions.

            • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]
              ·
              1 year ago

              Clearly. We all know that. But, conversely, if a president did start helping the proles, they would be in the news constantly. Probably heavily maligned too.

                • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Me either. Glad we got that out of the way. Now let me copy someone else's comment from earlier in the thread, because I think it's the point we're all trying to make that you seem extremely unwilling to understand:

                  If the policy outcomes are the same either way, I don't see why libs are so worked up over whether or not a president is boring.

                  • papertowels@lemmy.one
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    That's because I should've been more specific - on a spectrum of harmful-> neutral-> beneficial, I'd take neutral over harmful.

                    The president shouldn't be in the news for advertising Goya beans in the oval office. He shouldn't be conducting diplomacy in 180 characters or less on Twitter. Much of the appeal for the last administration was that he was considered "accessible" due to constantly being in the news, to no real benefit to the American people besides entertainment/feeding the media cycle. It was exhausting to wake up and hear the next mockery of the country on a daily basis.

                    Biden fucked up the railway unionizing, it's true, but I'd take not hearing about fuckups on the daily over the opposite.

                    • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      Yeah, good, ok. You have enough wealth and privilege that you can ignore politics and go back to brunch now that Biden is in office. Neat. Good for you.

                        • Are_Euclidding_Me [e/em/eir]
                          ·
                          1 year ago

                          The most obvious one is that my partner is going to have to start paying down his student loans again. We don't really have the money for that. But, sucks to be us, I guess!

                          • papertowels@lemmy.one
                            ·
                            1 year ago

                            What's your ideal endgame?

                            Biden waving his hands to forgive debts is a one-off that only helps a specific batch of folks. For me personally, I'd rather he start an investigation into why college tuitions are so high in the first place, but I don't know if that's actually within the presidents power, and if anything actionable can come out of it.

                            • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]
                              ·
                              1 year ago

                              brump thanks for sticking up for me Jack. It means a lot. Where do these people get off thinking i have the power to do anything? Its like Strom Thurman used to tell me, these uppity.. uh. I mean we had civility then, no joke. Ah... uh i shouldn't have said that.

                              Anyway, I hope they didn't spoil your brunch.

                    • AOCapitulator [they/them]
                      ·
                      1 year ago

                      The people crushing machine is still running at full bore, Biden is not neutral. You are not neutral. You support the system of the most incredible violence ever created

        • 2Password2Remember [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          the privilege dripping from this comment is disgusting. shut the fuck up liberal

          Death to America

        • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the policy outcomes are the same either way, I don't see why libs are so worked up over whether or not a president is boring.