I would probably still kill the latter. If you own tens of thousands of houses you become a market force, not a person
We might not be toiling in muck and surrendering the first bedding rights of our spouses, but we're still forking over an absurd amount of our labor power just for the privilege of not freezing to death.
Ι guess it might not be the same in the US but in Greece there's still poor landlords. Probably because of the higher home ownership rate. There's some people who make like 600 euros a month but also they inherited a small apartment they can rent out for like 250 euros, most of which won't be profit. Some of them can still be pretty shitty tho. But of course most landlords don't fall in that category either way.
Ok, FBI, I'll answer it anyways:
Aiming for the landlord isn't the productive solution. Aiming higher is, however, much more important. We must dismantle the system that gives landlords too much power over common folk, without that power landlords are useless and basically harmless.
If I had like a magic button that killed a random landlord somewhere, I'd probably press it a bunch of times. But I don't think I could kill someone more directly than that
I probably wouldn't kill my landlord, but that's just because he's ok.
I'd definitely kill my last landlord, though. Fucking slumlord.
No I wouldn’t FBI agent but I would give them spaghetti and meatballs if they asked nicely
If you were to be free from Jailtime or any legal consequences, would you cum?
Larping as CIA goon: Of course, that is why I took my job torturing people in Southern America for the benefit of the CIA!
Nah, cause then a bank would just end up end up owning it.
Hopefully no one from the CIA gives me stinger missles and plane tickets to davos. Haha.... unless...
Only for that crime? Or for any crime? Id go bigger than local slum lord
yeah on principle. like, I wouldn't necessarily enjoy it, but I would kinda have to, wouldn't I?
but redistribution and human centipeding would be much more satisfying.
