I recall some poll that said despite HKers supporting the protests to some degree, something like 90+% did not believe Beijing had violated 1 Country 2 Systems. The points that were often made were about Beijing courts ruling on HK basic law in a way disfavorable to the Protestors, but Basic Law says that the court responsible for interpreting Basic Law Beijing. There was also the national security law to criminalize kinds of foreign interference "imposed" by Beijing, however the HK Constitution mandates that such a law be implemented, it's just been decades without one as the legislature was never able to agree.
I recall some poll that said despite HKers supporting the protests to some degree, something like 90+% did not believe Beijing had violated 1 Country 2 Systems. The points that were often made were about Beijing courts ruling on HK basic law in a way disfavorable to the Protestors, but Basic Law says that the court responsible for interpreting Basic Law Beijing. There was also the national security law to criminalize kinds of foreign interference "imposed" by Beijing, however the HK Constitution mandates that such a law be implemented, it's just been decades without one as the legislature was never able to agree.