😙 👌 💦

The fucking S*n paper, where the journalists know less about the article than the readers (whom, it must be mentioned, are on average partially illiterate).

Yeah Biden's going to make sure Ronald and Nancy's campaign, so that every child will say "No" to drugs by 2022 /s

Wasn't his climate plan the worst of the Democrats? I've heard 2 things whispered.

1. Carbon neutral by 2050 which is incredibly vacuous because A) Biden will be dead, if not in 4 years certainly in 30, no one is to be held accountable to that promise and that's not an accident B) how are they going to ensure climate change policy happens accross what 7 terms? 6 of which could be Republicans. Sounds like fucking bs to me.

Why not cut CO2 emissions by 25% in his tenure? That's attainable... Why promise something 26 years after the fucking presidency that they obviously have no control over? lol its a lie

2. something about $2 trillion in subsidies. Which if that is even remotely true will subsidise oil companies (because I'm willing to bet they're lobbying more than Chinese solar panel companies). To persuade oil Co.'s to produce natural gas or some form of sustainable energy on the side (while providing enough cahsflow for them not to default under market conditions). If Exxon is not the first recipient on the list of sustainable grant benefactors I would eat my own dick

Putting former presidents against the wall needs to be normalised if we want a functional democracy

Link? I wanna see fire go boom boom

Honestly just wiki Tim McNicol.

He was in a number of legal battles against Corbyn to prevent him from coming leader.

Was appointed to the board that governs Labour where he oversaw misconduct ie sexism antisemitism etc. Based on both the leak and the report the GLU (McNicol) just 'didn't read' the emails and let antisemitism complaints fester. The EHRC report acknowledges this.

So yes there were a number of valid complaints of anti-semitism (although 100s - almost half over his tenure were false complaints as well made by 1 MP - hmmm), however the board (McNicol's) failed to suspend anyone or do anything in a timely fashion, they did nothing basically. And Corbyn or any leader has to let it play out or enter into huge legal battles. The GLU had him by the balls from here and they were none the wiser.

There were a bunch of hit pieces from far right Israeli media outlets like Jewish chronicle etc that disliked his views on Palistine and constantly smeared him. He has also supported Palestinian groups etc.

there is a lot more dirty politics here, that idk enough about

Basically if he ever spoke to anyone he was accused of all their deeds by association. One day he was an anti semite, a Russian asset, an IRA member, a rabbit killer, a rapist, whatever. The only thing that could realistically be leveraged was anti-semitism which insiders in the party could leverage.

Corbyn was criticised in the report as interfering with the suspension process (he's not legally allowed to) and has to be left to basically McNicols and the board, by accelerating the suspension of Kinnock over anti semitic remarks. (yes lol, this is the example they gave in the report). And since JC appointed Emily Thornberry things improved a lot. This is also in the report.

It does mention a lack of leadership... Ie not having 'obvious' rules of conduct ie on par with sexism, however JC is evidenced to have provided this. So it's a ambiguous statement to make given that there isn't a threshold/recomendation provided by the EHCR.

........

Starmer was going to fire JC no matter what was in the report. However his legal grounds for doing so are particularly shaky atm and the report deliberately left parts open to interpretation (surprises there lol), but there's going to be a court battle .

Starmer is purging the left, went for the smaller moves, pushing front bench MPs to the back bench; for going against ridiculous votes (ie votes that enabled torture etc), to pushing them from posting guardian articles, and because everyone is conditioned to Starmers 'unity' he can go for a bigger prize - JC.

I've seen "Conservative or Starmer" flairs pop up on r/LabourUK.

Truly controlled opposition

Wait, your balls aren't that big?

Get fucked fascist pigs o7

Half man, half bear, half hog

Say what

Capitalism: The saviour of ECOLOGY?

Can't wait for ecological supply to be so low that it becomes profitable to sell it as a luxury item for the middle class. Literally the dumbest mofo 🤡 sorry, McMofo

As someone who will never buy this, I actually back this move. At least its more environmental

It's astrology for chuds and fascists

I'm sure it would matter if their ideologies were remotely relevant to a reality

Hello Jeremy, its been a while

His before and after hair salon pic

I seriously don't understand tweeting this. At an environmental issue it's a disaster. At an economic standpoint (majorly for oil) its expensive, unsustainable and we have alternatives.

Why tweet that you are an energy company's bitch?

There must be something really fucking obvious reason that I'm missing about pro-fracking talk that drags hordes of millennials to the voting booth

Based

I don't think this works as intended. Pence obviously is working with Trump, but I don't remember him renouncing his faith in marriage/immigration.

However Kamala actively changed her ideals and narrative, no?