SurveyMonkey links: Part 1, Part 2
Edit: apparently Survey Monkey maxes out at 40 responses and I’m not about to pay $100 to raise that cap because I’m broke af. Don’t use Survey Monkey
The survey
- Are you now, or have you ever been, a subscriber of the subreddit r/ChapoTrapHouse?
- How long have you been active on Hexbear/ChapoChat, including time spent lurking or on previous accounts?
- How long did you lurk before making an account?
- How long did you have an account before you posted?
- In a typical week, how many times would you estimate you visit the site?
- When you make a post or comment, is it typically in response to something else on the site or is it usually prompted elsewhere? (For example, some people will create a post to follow up on other posts and some people will make megathread comments which have no relation to other comments)
- Are you more interested in the topics discussed on Hexbear or in the people who are present here?
- These are some of the goals we had in mind when launching the site. Please provide a rating from 1 to 5 of how well you believe the site has accomplished these goals. 1 is the least successful. 5 is the most successful. Feel free to provide commentary after your rating. The goals are, in no particular order:
- Create an online space which would preserve as much social momentum from r/ChapoTrapHouse as possible following the ban of the subreddit
- Ensure the space was welcoming to marginalized voices and identities
- Provide resources which aid in organization efforts
- Foster a culture which allowed for leftist education and discussion
- Allow users to use the site as a positive outlet for their mental health
- Contribute to the open source community generally and to the fediverse specifically
- Encourage privacy of our users by default and create a culture which values basic opsec
- Experiment with what modern social media could look like outside of corporate control
- Minimize sectarianism and make a robust case for left unity
- Make sure the space is a fun and less habit-forming experience than corporate social media
- Please add any additional comments below, including any relevant context about yourself or specific issues you with to discuss:
Please include the prompts with your answers
FAQ
Who are you, BMO?
I was one of the original admins for the site. I was in the dev server prior to launch and was involved with the inner workings of the admin team for the site’s first year.
Why did you put together this survey?
I’m looking to put a tidy little bow on this chapter of my life by doing a post-mortem of it. That means I want to hear from people here; Lurkers, newgang, casuals, and PoWEr pOStErs alike. I want to hear anything, good or bad, from the serious all the way to the inconsequential.
I’m particularly interested in people who haven’t felt well represented by the admin team or by the site’s more active userbase. If you’ve ever had an issue with the site that you haven’t felt able to voice, now’s as good a time as any.
Is this survey coordinated with the admin team?
Nope. If they don’t like me doing it they’ll remove the post and I’ll let it be. If they see any results, it’ll be in the same way y’all do: in a post on the site.
Edit: it appears the post has been featured, but this answer still stands
Can I participate in the survey anonymously/privately?
I’d prefer site DMs from active accounts, but feel free to send me messages from throwaways, comment on the post, or fill out the SurveyMonkey survey
I may share a summary of my findings in a post, but I will not be sharing copies of the surveys and will not be quoting any of them verbatim without asking first.
Edit 1: Added a SurveyMonkey option
Edit 2: I rephrased the questions about the survey because y’all couldn’t help repeating the same joke of answering those questions instead of the survey lol
spoiler
Yah. Joined early in 2016, I think.
Since the start.
Nope. But I visited /r/ChapoTrapHouse for about a month before actually subscribing it.
Dozens of minutes.
It's one of the default things I check when I need a mental break, so like 6-7 times a day. Most of those are very quick, I only actually read a whole long threads like 2-3 times a week.
I am a commenter at heart. I only start actual posts here because I know the site needs it.
People. Talking about organizing tactics and whatnot once in a while is fun, but mostly I'm here for the "off-topic" stuff about science and video games or whatever, but with a crowd of people who are funny, and aren't a bunch of psychopaths. Did you know that "not being useful to the ruling class is a crime, and the just punishment is death by exposure" is considered a normal opinion in our society? If you don't want to hang out with people who believe that, you've already excluded huge swaths of the internet.
1 - Nah the momentum died.
4 - Yeah it's fine. Could be more welcoming to people with common incorrect opinions though. You can't get full marks for inclusivity if it's conditional.
2 - There are nice guides sometimes but none of it is alive.
1 - It's way too much "have the correct opinion or get yelled at" and people treat education as "go read these 20 books" more than actually bothering to put in the work.
2 - It seems better now, but I left for like a half year last year, because everything was doomers all the time.
IDK lol. I looked into contributing but it was a huge pile of weird technologies I'm not familiar with, confusing opsec standards, and unclear direction.
5 - Probably overdid it and hurt the organizational and social aspects a little? But this was definitely successful.
3 - The difference in what can show up on the front page is remarkable, but I don't think this breaks from corporate norms to anywhere near the extent that is possible. The actual structure of the website is the same as reddit, so it's just as smoothed over palatable to investors. It's missing avatars, user flairs, user-specific CCS, moderators being able to slap images over people's posts. No specific one of those is important, but things in that general feel are what we're missing because everything needs to look safe and serious to investors.
I was active on bulletin boards back before "social media" was a term, and none of those were corporate controlled. And nothing about this site is as fresh and wild as what we had back then.
3 - It's very much an ML site. People mostly get chastised for making fun of anarchists, but there's not really any actual grappling with anarchist ideas going on here. Also it's apparently acceptable to make fun of trots?
4 - I'm not sure that's a coherent goal? But it doesn't have the absurd pro-engagement antipatterns that keep getting added to everything, so it gets decent marks kind of by default there.
I've also been around since forums and BBS's and stuff. I always found the flairs, avatars, signatures, etc to be really gaudy and complete screen pollution. It was extremely common for a person's signup date and post count displayed right next to their avatar too, which I never liked. It fostered a sense of weird elitism and could be intimidating for new users who just wanted to contribute to a discussion. It certainly was for me. I was also never a fan of a user contributing maybe a few words in a reply but their huge signature and links to all their stuff was still there. Cluttered as heck.
I prefer what we have here, which is recognition of good posters based only on sheer name recognition.
deleted by creator