Fine art was now basically censored by the stalinist regime. But luckily there was a surprising twist of events that created an amazing loophole. The state owned film industry ... hired artists to work on poster designs for movies, but they absolutely didn’t care what they would look like.
Ah, so art was censored, except these numerous cases of it not being censored which I am writing a whole article about. Like, how do you even write those sentences without something going off in your mind about the blatant contradiction?
The principle that Fascist organizations can't accurately assess their opponents because their ideology requires that the enemy be simultaneously strong and weak is proven yet again.
Hah, love this line:
Ah, so art was censored, except these numerous cases of it not being censored which I am writing a whole article about. Like, how do you even write those sentences without something going off in your mind about the blatant contradiction?
The Stalinist regime of Khrushchev era USSR
No, you see, all socialists are stalinists. Lenin? A stalinist. The Paris commune? A stalinist project. Marx? Stalinist.
Stalin? Surprisingly not Stalinist.
Stalin wasn't a real Stalinist. Trotsky should have succeeded Lenin as the rightful Stalinist leader of the USSR!
Stalin was actually a devout follower of Juan Posadas, much to the chagrin of liberals who believe in revisionist concepts like linear time.
The evil tankie Stalinist regime censored the arts, except the art that had the most exposure to the public. It makes perfect sense.
В период с 1961 по 1982 годы «Над пропастью во ржи» стала самой запрещаемой книгой в школах и библиотеках США.
The principle that Fascist organizations can't accurately assess their opponents because their ideology requires that the enemy be simultaneously strong and weak is proven yet again.