But they’d send in the national guard to break that.
And if the National Guard shot people (even killed them) - libs would simply adopt a serious tone and say vile shit like "The strikes threated our national security".
And the very next day after the "unfortunate shootings" Rachel Maddow has a special report...
Maddow: "There are indications Russia could be behind the strikes. Isn't that the case, Mr. Tool?
Mike Tool - MSNBC national security expert: "Yes, Rachel. It seems suspicious that organized labor could do anything by themselves. There is chatter that Russia influenced events via Facebook activity..."
And they have a great time chatting and blue skying for ~10 minutes until the ads start.
The state in question would ask Biden for help. And Biden would be chomping at the bit to crush the strikers damaging America.
I'm not a lawyer but I've seen one on teevee so I'm sure Biden's legal legal team could come up with a mechanism to temporally suspended (or whatever the legal term is) The Posse Comitatus Act. Biden would give a speech and say this action was done in the name of - you guessed it - national security.
The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385, original at 20 Stat. 152) signed on June 18, 1878, by President Rutherford B. Hayes which limits the powers of the federal government in the use of federal military personnel to enforce domestic policies within the United States.
No I mean like, what happens when the laws of probability have a stroke and a crowd of protestors successfully routs the National Guard, drone strikes and all?
Speaking far more realistically - the governor would bring in 10x as many NG along with stuff like armored personnel carriers and other matériel to scare the utter crap out of the strikers. The governor would give them an ultimatum - "Disband with ______ hours or face the consequences".
And - if we want to go back to a sci-fi like unreality - the next day if there were "enough" strikers - in the mind of the governor - they'd be arrested. And if they refused - ridiculous amounts of force would be used on them. Maybe there would be an "unfortunate" death or two. And then the state government and/or the DOJ would give them obscenely long jail sentences.
They can't let the plebs think they have any sort of power at all.
There's a great couple episodes of the working class history podcast about a similar situation under the dictatorship in South Korea in the 80s. The workers liberated the city for a few days, and then the full force of the military was concentrated and the uprising was suppressed :(
And if the National Guard shot people (even killed them) - libs would simply adopt a serious tone and say vile shit like "The strikes threated our national security".
Yup. "Treats are the basis of our national security" would become a media narrative.
And the very next day after the "unfortunate shootings" Rachel Maddow has a special report...
Maddow: "There are indications Russia could be behind the strikes. Isn't that the case, Mr. Tool?
Mike Tool - MSNBC national security expert: "Yes, Rachel. It seems suspicious that organized labor could do anything by themselves. There is chatter that Russia influenced events via Facebook activity..."
And they have a great time chatting and blue skying for ~10 minutes until the ads start.
Theoretically, what happens if the National Guard loses?
The state in question would ask Biden for help. And Biden would be chomping at the bit to crush the strikers damaging America.
I'm not a lawyer but I've seen one on teevee so I'm sure Biden's legal legal team could come up with a mechanism to temporally suspended (or whatever the legal term is) The Posse Comitatus Act. Biden would give a speech and say this action was done in the name of - you guessed it - national security.
No I mean like, what happens when the laws of probability have a stroke and a crowd of protestors successfully routs the National Guard, drone strikes and all?
Speaking far more realistically - the governor would bring in 10x as many NG along with stuff like armored personnel carriers and other matériel to scare the utter crap out of the strikers. The governor would give them an ultimatum - "Disband with ______ hours or face the consequences".
And - if we want to go back to a sci-fi like unreality - the next day if there were "enough" strikers - in the mind of the governor - they'd be arrested. And if they refused - ridiculous amounts of force would be used on them. Maybe there would be an "unfortunate" death or two. And then the state government and/or the DOJ would give them obscenely long jail sentences.
They can't let the plebs think they have any sort of power at all.
well, as long as we're just lying down and taking it, we don't :(
There's a great couple episodes of the working class history podcast about a similar situation under the dictatorship in South Korea in the 80s. The workers liberated the city for a few days, and then the full force of the military was concentrated and the uprising was suppressed :(
You mean the full force of the military with the US army's backing
Take a look at what is happening in Kazakhstan literally right now, the protesters there just did that