Pass me the cyanide gas because this seems like a highly successful op.

The 30 year old dog walker did an interview on Fox that was pretty cringe but all in all not THAT bad imo but is set off a firestorm and 200k people instantly joined /r/workreform

Here's where it gets fun. The 3 mods of /r/workreform all work at the same bank. One is A CTO and the others claim to be low level employees. Link

The new sub seems like a bunch of libshits. "It’s work reforms not anti capitalism"

"This isn't necessarily an anti-capitalism sub. We may share many of the same ideals and goals, but "

"If you want anticaptialism, go to /r/LateStageCapitalism"

tl;dr a 30 yo dog walker was too much for the libs to handle 😅

  • riley
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • bigboopballs [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      yeah, kinda gross that a lot of comments on reddit (and even here) think there's a problem with walking dogs part-time, saying it's not "real work" or something. even on the slightly more "left-leaning" subreddits

      god forbid there's a moment of a person's time that isn't sold to the fucking capitalists 🙄

      • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        the irony of someone associating with "antiwork" while espousing crude moral workerism lmao

        0 hour workweek or death. fuck optics make them interview you in person and show up in a bomb vest.

  • LeninsRage [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Doesn't matter if its an op or not because this "movement" was always 100% online and had a huge contingent of NEET nonsense

    • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      It was a 1.4M member community that was constantly posting support for unionization efforts across the country.

      While no vanguard, it was a significant space on reddit that pulled people away from some of the typical :brainworms:

      • LeninsRage [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Again being blunt, if you're 100% online then expressing rhetorical support for unionization is nothing more than screaming into a void.

        • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]
          ·
          3 years ago

          True but I'm not looking at it from an actionable vanguard perspective.

          In the same way most of reddit propagates brainworm lib takes, a large community all shouting "wtf is going on?" has an effect towards common view/perspective. It made people curious, interested, and supportive of strikes an union efforts, which in turn would help actual union drives because there'd be one less "but i could use my dues to buy xbox" dummy.

          /r/antiwork was never going to take up arms, but libs need some place to start questioning the status quo. Its a shame it was cut short by baby anarchists who had no understanding of maintaining a movement.

    • SuperNovaCouchGuy [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      huge contingent of NEET nonsense

      r/antiwork was never going to be a movement, but this needs elaboration, otherwise this is a proper :reddit-logo: brained fundamentalist protestant irrational dogshit opinion you have there

      Edit: upon elaboration and reflection I actually made a very big mistake in failing to understand what OP meant, I apologize to @LeninsRage and @Parzivus and everyone else for the hateful reactionary language and for my general shitty hostile behaviour. Logging off.

      • LeninsRage [he/him]
        ·
        3 years ago

        People are alienated from work because the capitalist time and labor regimen is egregiously dehumanizing and saps workers of all autonomy and meaning in their lives.

        But the solution to that isn't "I want to sit around and mindlessly pursue pleasure on my computer all day" which is a very real tendency within the incoherent bloc that made up that subreddit. A socialist society means transforming labor relations - control over work schedules, work processes, distributions of goods, services, and wages, democratization and mass participation in all areas of political and economic life. But that also means work. A lot of it. Everyone doing their part.

        We rightfully express contempt for terminally-online channer/Yang NEET types who spend all their time online and support UBI solely for the reason that they think it can subsidize their basement-dweller lifestyle. And to be blunt, if you're on the left and display similar sentiments, you're never going to get any respect from working people, just contempt.

            • SuperNovaCouchGuy [any]
              ·
              3 years ago

              So this is whats happening. Since im pissed at seeing neoliberal ideology here, i get angry and become a polemic asshole.

              Therefore, pedants like yourself can happily focus on my appaling rude language, on the surface level, because you desperately want to own the person defending slimy NEETs yet cant find anything wrong with my arguments.

          • _Flippy_ [he/him]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Listen you stupid piece of shit

            Cringe + L + Ratio

            • SuperNovaCouchGuy [any]
              ·
              3 years ago

              Cope, Im taking home a W. here, nobody can actually criticise the substance.

              • _Flippy_ [he/him]
                ·
                3 years ago

                Nah it's more that no one wants to read all that shit and get into it with a debatelord who speaks like a le epic redditor

                • SuperNovaCouchGuy [any]
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Lmao you think im unpleasant and overly verbose, fair, but you still have nothing else of substance to say because the real reason youre not reading shit is because youre scared of an L. nothing more.

          • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
            ·
            3 years ago

            There's nothing neoliberal about wanting westerners to take responsibility for their lifestyle and stop taking advantage of everyone in the global south to make everything for them. What do you think is going to happen when the global south is going to stop making your treats for you? If the west wants anything resembling a first world lifestyle, they're going to have to start manufacturing their own stuff. There will be a lot of work to build a fair and equitable global society in any revolution worth its salt. This isn't about NEETS or anything ( I don't even know what that term means), it's about westerners taking responsibility for their actions.

            • SuperNovaCouchGuy [any]
              ·
              3 years ago

              This isn’t about NEETS or anything ( I don’t even know what that term means),

              No investigation, no right to speak. :mao-wtf:

            • SuperNovaCouchGuy [any]
              ·
              3 years ago

              There’s nothing neoliberal about wanting westerners to take responsibility for their lifestyle....

              :michael-laugh: :michael-laugh: :michael-laugh:

              I agree westoids shouldnt exploit everyone else, for the record.

      • Parzivus [any]
        ·
        3 years ago

        I think they're just saying that reddit in general is terrible for actually organizing anything and tend just be dunk tanks. Which is fun, but not something to get super beat up about losing.

          • aaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            > accuses everyone of being reactionary

            > Uses the words "cuck" and "soyboy" and "cope and seethe"

            :jesse-wtf:

            Just log off and calm down, it's not worth it

            • SuperNovaCouchGuy [any]
              ·
              3 years ago

              I only accused 1 person of being a reactionary after they accused me first, and using the word "cuck" and "soyboy" is no grounds to accuse someone of being a reactionary. You just want to find reasons to own the person defending an easy target, NEETs so you reach and fish instead of engaging with the substance of what I say.

          • Parzivus [any]
            ·
            3 years ago

            nonsense of the unemployment

            If that's what you got out of NEET, no answer they give you is going to satisfy you anyway lol

  • gofer300 [none/use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    The new sub seems like a bunch of libshits. “It’s work reforms not anti capitalism”

    "This isn’t necessarily an anti-capitalism sub. We may share many of the same ideals and goals, but "

    “If you want anticaptialism, go to /r/LateStageCapitalism”

    tbh the same could be said about the /r/antiwork, with the sub that big you can't escape the libs, but you shouldn't want to avoid them anyway. People won't radicalize themselves and /r/antiwork was doing good work with that and hopefully after all the drama settles there will emerge a sub with better mods.

  • SuperNovaCouchGuy [any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    this is fucking sad because r/antiwork was based enough to:

    1. be anti-capitalist, socialist even

    2. have an ethos which strikes at the core of the entire puritanical religious fundamentalist superstructure ("humans have to earn the right to exist") in a way that everyone in imperialist nations can relate to

    3. never have a huge backslide into reactionary "muh poor and unemployed ppl bad bcuz gvt makes me work for them" ideology despite having 1.4 million members

    4. cause problems for companies irl

    • Neckbeard_Prime [they/them,he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      cause problems for companies irl

      And this is why they had to be torpedoed. I am not convinced that this wasn't deliberate; it's too perfect.

      • Parzivus [any]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        That is an actual ideology. Essentially, it involves abusing loopholes in welfare and living with as many other people as possible doing the same thing to do as little work as possible with low expenses while using your large amount of free time for whatever you feel like. I think there's a book about it, dunno the name though.

  • seitanicRights [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    It's naive to believe you can turn mass media against capital when you have no control over the broadcast narrative. That said, I feel really bad for the mod. This can't feel great.

    But yeah, Reddit itself is an op, so it makes sense that this would be an op too, despite the fact that most of y'all are from Reddit :headpat:

    • Mother [any]
      ·
      3 years ago

      most of y’all are from Reddit

      :angery:

  • vccx [they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Absolutely an op. Any "movement" that can be shut down with a few clicks is just a honeypot. Hundreds of thousands of libs scooped up into a toothless reform racket instead of radicalizing,

    • Omega_Haxors [they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      and the fucked up thing is that intelligence agencies are going to mark those libs as "violent radicals" in their databases.

    • CyberMao [it/its]
      ·
      3 years ago

      They let the net get as full as they can without it ripping

  • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    RAPE CONTENT WARNING facebook screenshots supposedly proving that the mod who did the interview is a sex criminal were posted by an account that's less than a month old (and crossposted to cringe subs of course). i'm not even following this shit the only reason i know about it is because i was hate-scrolling terf tumblr and they picked it up immediately.

    more and more this entire debacle looks like an op. i don't think a subreddit was going to form a revolutionary vanguard party or whatever, but it's way too easy for enemy forces to manipulate the dogbrains of :reddit-logo:.

    e: and of course there's an active thread on kiwifarms, which i won't be linking to

    • SgtHatred [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      saying it was an op is copium. The mod who did the interview was one of the original founders of the sub in 2014.

      • space_comrade [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Honestly it's really ridiculous how quick people in leftist spaces are to call something an OP.

        People of all kinds (that includes communists) are perfectly capable of being idiots and/or pieces of shit all on their own, no intelligence agency meddling needed. This is something literally all organizations in the history of mankind had to deal with.

        Calling everything bad that happens an OP is defeatism mixed with blind paranoia.

      • HumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        i mean i think the way the subreddit's collapse was set up and is being managed is an op. i think abolishwork is probably sincere, and secondary sourcing for the accusation is convincing.

      • crime [she/her, any]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Some of the other mods, who encouraged this mod to do the interview, are feds. Fox specifically reaching out to and requesting an interview from this mod is suspicious. A team of bankers prepared to swoop in and redirect the sub to liberal reformism is suspicious.

        Just because this mod is likely not a fed doesn't mean it wasn't an op, and doesn't mean that that there hasn't been any coordinated action on the part of the state and/or capital to nerf the sub as a means of kneecapping the movement.

    • Elon_Musk [none/use name]
      hexagon
      ·
      3 years ago

      This person has been posting antiwork content for 7 years and has run abolishwork.com for at least as long.

  • mr_world [they/them]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Even if people were hesitant to call it an OP, you can still consider the nature of reddit. Some "movement" happens on reddit and people will create subs to feed off it. Once the sub blows up, they can monetize it and sell off the top mod positions. At best it's not an OP but a few people trying to bandwagon and make some quick cash/internet cred. At worst this shit was/is heavily astroturfed and infiltrated.

  • Elon_Musk [none/use name]
    hexagon
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    I'm 85% sure this is the programmer, CTO or whatever

    https://twitter.com/shawnmilo

    https://www.linkedin.com/in/shawn-milochik-938aba187/

    This isn't doxxing this is public info, fight me

    • eXAt [he/him]
      ·
      3 years ago

      The Twitter bio has this quote in it lol

      ahead of the curve on the cultural revolution

  • D61 [any]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Best thing to happen to antiwork maybe?

    Let the more militant agitators on r/antiwork "help" the mods by separating the wheat from the chaff so to speak.

  • thirstywizard [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    Wonder if proworker is taken, reform won't fix the mess. Libs never learn and are eternal victims.

  • drhead [he/him]
    ·
    3 years ago

    I'm personally waiting for the dust to settle before I cast judgement on them. Most likely they work for the bank as low-level employees like they said, and the other person who is at the same bank was just a co-worker who they knew they could trust with moderation duties instead of some rando on the internet. Frankly, if we're going to have any sort of socialist movement gain broad support in the US, we're just going to have to come to terms with the fact that a bunch of us are in the professional managerial class.

    It's already better than /r/antiwork in terms of being free of the terminally-online sectarian bullshit the antiwork mods were pushing.