• kristina [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    dudes got a watch who tf has watches these days but booj

    edit: heheheh

    • Catherine_Steward [she/her]
      ·
      2 years ago

      It really is a fantastic symbol for those with more money than they know what to do with. Absolutely no one needs a watch today. Except maybe people who spend a lot of time underwater, seems like it might be useful then.

      • anaesidemus [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        sometimes you wanna check the time without having to get your phone, and risking spending precious minutes of your life looking at bullshit on the internet

        • Catherine_Steward [she/her]
          ·
          2 years ago

          password protect your phone, you arent required to give cops a password (unlike biometrics). and then unless you make the active decision to go through the momentary inconvenience to unlock the phone, it is essentially a pocket watch.

          • anaesidemus [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            yeah, a pocket watch with access to memes and cat videos 😅

            • Catherine_Steward [she/her]
              ·
              2 years ago

              if you cant keep yourself from inputting your password to unlock your phone to look at cat videos, how do you stop yourself from pulling it out of your pocket to do so

              • anaesidemus [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                because it's in my pocket? anyway, my main point is that it's not necessarily bourgeois decadence to own a watch, unless it's some fancy rolex or a techbro spy machine

                • Catherine_Steward [she/her]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  because it’s in my pocket?

                  inputting your password is a stronger barrier than taking it out of your pocket though

                    • Catherine_Steward [she/her]
                      ·
                      2 years ago

                      i really dont understand whats so difficult to get about this. it takes more time and effort to enter a password than it does to remove your phone from your pocket.

                      • anaesidemus [he/him]
                        ·
                        2 years ago

                        let's take it back to the beginning, because Mao tells us to do things thoroughly.

                        I want to check the time:

                        I have a cheap watch = I see the time and I go about my day

                        I use my phone = I see the time and oh, a notification, or, hmm I wonder if something is happening on hexbear, let's check since the phone is already in my hand (I use fingerprint so it's easy for me)

                        That is my experience, I can see that yours might be different and that's fine.

                      • chicken_pizza [comrade/them]
                        ·
                        2 years ago

                        i've got my lockscreen code in the muscle memory (also my phone has a fingerprint reader so it's even faster), whereas pulling out the phone is hard because i've got big hands and they get stuck in my pockets lol

                        • Catherine_Steward [she/her]
                          ·
                          2 years ago

                          (also my phone has a fingerprint reader so it’s even faster)

                          im going to quote the part where i advised against this

                          password protect your phone, you arent required to give cops a password (unlike biometrics)

                          it was based on this premise (that you are being smart with your security by not using biometrics) that i said it is more difficult to unlock your phone than to pull it out of your pocket

      • SuperZutsuki [they/them, any]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Phones suck for checking the time. If I'm working with my hands I don't want to stop what I'm doing, wash my hands, and pull my phone out to look at some numbers. This take is extremely out-of-touch and only applies to white collar do-nothing jobs where one is never actually busy or dirty. Healthcare, food service, any blue collar job — a watch is better if not necessary. I have never seen a nurse without a watch, for instance.

        • Quimby [any, any]
          ·
          2 years ago

          I have never seen a nurse without a watch

          holy shit. I don't have a horse in this race, but this just blew my mind. you're 100% right and I've literally never thought about that before.

      • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        This is honestly a goofy af take.

        Would you shit on someone for non-time telling jewelry? "No one needs bracelets anymore"

        Watches are awesome little contraptions that sit on your wrist minding their business until you glance at them. Not every watch is a $10k Omega.

        • Catherine_Steward [she/her]
          ·
          2 years ago

          “No one needs bracelets anymore”

          no one ever needed bracelets, they're decorative. watches are just outdated technology, the purpose of which is served by something you already own

          • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            That's sorta the point. No one ever needed bracelets, yet every culture ever have made them. Its not a bad thing to find some joys in life that can double as utility.

              • Shinji_Ikari [he/him]
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                Sure, which is why i'm using bracelets. Watches are essentially bracelets with a widget that provides a function.

                So if bracelets aren't inherently bourgeoisie, neither are watches. Both can be bourgeoisie, but to classify all as bourgeoisie because they no longer serve a purpose, is what makes this take goofy.

                additionally, others have made the point providing situations where checking your watch is infinitely easier and more appropriate than checking your phone. Plenty of situations where you can't touch your phone because your hands are nasty, don't want to pull your phone out in an environment where it could be damaged, etc. Why risk your multi-100 dollar lifeline to modern times when you could wear a sub 100 dollar widget that never needs charging.

      • FunkyStuff [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I have a fairly cheap digital watch, the strap broke a few months ago and before I got a new strap I would be checking my wrist for the time at least 8 times per day. The convenience of having the time a half second away from me at all times really can't be understated.

      • thisismyrealname [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        you can buy a cheap ass digital watch for like $15 bucks, hell even a decent analog you can buy used for like $50-$100 if you really want one

        does having a spare $15 make someone bourgeois?

    • star_wraith [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      :side-eye-1: :side-eye-2:

      Counterpoint: Che and Fidel were Watch Guys...

    • StuporTrooper [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      IMO if you're doing any sort of criminal or suspicious activity you should have a watch. Gotta be able to look quickly at the time.

      Also I got a watch when I started working with kids. Can't have your phone out all the time, it's much quicker to look at your wrist.