Edit: looks like HexbearHater got banned. Shoutout to ThatOneCalculator, who posted too close to the sun on main and had their account deleted
Edit: looks like HexbearHater got banned. Shoutout to ThatOneCalculator, who posted too close to the sun on main and had their account deleted
Using
git
for drafting laws and legal documents is actually cool and good and something that should be standard. Dumbass lawyers are still doing M$ word highlighting to keep track of who edited what. Doing it publicly though on github and over a crypto bill is dumb and dumber.For those of you who don't know:
git
is more or less built on blockchain technology except all the blocks are free so its actually super useful.I agree with this but I am not even sure it is a bad thing it is public, I can't really see a good argument why drafting legislation needs to be secret unless I'm missing something obvious here.
The only assumption is that maybe public attention would affect the process but isn't that the point of "democracy"?
Doing it for something intrinsically stupid like this reinforces the norm that we don't expect to be able to freely comment on legislation as it's developed.
Haven't thought about this much, but I suspect using git there's a similar problem that occurs in other public areas:
The cranks with the most free time could be the loudest voice and exercise outsized influence against the public interest. This is what happens in municipal councils all the time.
which is why the good ending is we're all cranks with too much free time and can be equally loud
The only problem with drafting it publicly is its open to sabotage, as seen here.
I'm seeing git and git-like version control catch on more and more and I'm here for it, I love it because it helps me learn more how to use git and everything is improved because of it.