Who has the recs?

  • Jadzia_Dax [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    One thing I would strongly recommend is being wary of anything that is second wave feminism or earlier. The majority of 1st and 2nd wave western feminist movements were white and cishet centered. They were largely focused on getting access to the power structures of patriarchy and imperialism for white cishet women instead of true liberation.

    There are also a lot of issues in second wave feminism around viewing masculinity and men as somehow inherently evil, which is total bullshit and leads to bizarre reactionary concepts like "political lesbianism" and TERFs.

    I'm sure there is some interesting work in there if you can read it critically, but I view it as having minimal modern use in comparison to modern intersectional feminism.

      • Jadzia_Dax [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        You're welcome! That's definitely a summarized explanation, but I want to make sure you engage with theory understanding that context. Unsurprisingly, intersectionality is essential for liberation.

        :feminism:

  • HoChiMaxh [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    My literacy with feminist theory is low, but Sylvia Federici and Barbara Ehrenreich are both cool

        • edwardligma [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          caliban and the witch is absolutely amazing and i would highly recommend it to everyone. its a fantastic work of steadfastly materialist history that centres the place of women and their labour (as both actors and subjects) in a robust examination of the class struggles between the aristocracy/bourgeoisie/peasantry-into-proletariat in the centuries of transition from feudalism to capitalism in europe, and its both academic and also quite easy to read

        • Jadzia_Dax [she/her]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I haven't read Caliban and the Witch either, but have heard good things. It's on my already too long reading list.

  • Kookie [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Simone de Beauvoir's "The Second Sex". It has the sentence that started the trans movement.

    "One is not born, but is rather made, a woman."

    She certainly didn't intend it this way, but it is wonderful waving this in the faces of TERFs when they tell you a woman is an adult human female. And the beautiful part is that they can't refute the statement without kicking the legs out from under their entire feminist movement. The Second Sex was huge for feminism.

  • LeninsBeard [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Just looking at my bookshelf:

    Women, Race and Class and Whipping Girl have both been mentioned but I'll reiterate those.

    All of Alexandra Kollontai's writings are really good, if a bit outdated in terms of sex work and women's roles as mothers.

    Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale by Maria Mies is a good intro to Marxist feminism

    Ain't I a Woman by Bell Hooks is a good black feminist perspective, as is Sister Outsider by Audre Lord

    Leslie Feinberg's works are all great, and while they're focused on trans issues they intersect a lot with feminism.

  • Jadzia_Dax [she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I would recommend Whipping Girl by Julia Serano. It's queer trans feminist theory and an extremely good read about how patriarchy fuels misogyny, homophobia, and transphobia.

    It was written in 2007, so some of the terminology around trans people is a little dated, but the core of the book remains relevant.

  • Jadzia_Dax [she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    @Owl - any recs? You always come to mind as a comrade with a good understanding of feminism.

    • Owl [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      reaper_cushions already recommended “Women, Race, and Class” by Angela Davis, which is the big one.

      I would also recommend the ShitRedditSays recommended reading list, which is a nice collection of short and effective articles, by the people I learned feminism from. They have links to longer essays from the 101 links. The only caveat is that it says you should read the ShitRedditSays FAQ first, which you don't, because they haven't been relevant in nearly a decade.

      Also it's a mixed bag of whether you'll get Marxist-feminism or not there. The short version is that class struggle fits inside intersectionality theory, and class is just another axis of oppression within the kyriarchy (although the biggest one by a lot). That's a lot of jargon right now, but when you see these terms defined and wonder how they fit with class, just come back to that description. Nesting the theories this way works very well, and they're very compatible when composed this way.

      (Often I find that people are hostile to Marxist-feminism, because they see treating intersectionality as the more general one as somehow robbing the prestige of Marxism, and how can this squishy thing by girls be more important than the immortal science? And if you find that you're one of those people, it'd be good to spend some time unpacking your assumptions.)

  • Ericthescruffy [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    I'm not sure it's really qualified as theory, but if you're a cishet man reading this thread, a parent especially, I'd highly recommend "How to raise a feminist son" by Sonora Jha.

    As someone with a redpilled ex living in the imperial core I've been struggling with how to work through that and that book helped me a lot. She talks a lot about how she engaged with media over the course of raising her son and how she repurposed even stories that reinforce patriarchy as a way to introduce critical thinking. It has a specific anecdote that I resonated with quite strongly where she went to see a film with her son he had seen prior and she caught him watching to see her reaction to see if she saw what he did. Sort of a common practice in my own family to be honest.