https://nitter.1d4.us/charliebilello/status/1635982686111121408

  • emizeko [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    "first they came for european industry, and I didn't speak up beacuse i'm a european finance capitalist. then they came for european banking, and there was no one who cared"

  • betelgeuse [comrade/them]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Respect the fucking grift.

    Someday I hope to juke politicians the way these people do. Having all the political power seems fucking rad.

  • Snackuleata [any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Reminds me of when Texas became the big spot to move your crypto mining operation because the government was paying people to not mine bitcoin.

    • hexaflexagonbear [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      They are, I think this is the government management trying to keep depositors calm. From what I've heard the deposits can be covered, but it's conditional on liquidating assets at close to their market rate, which takes a while.

  • LeninWalksTheWorld [any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    do NOT talk about moral hazard we need to focus on getting the line to go up right now

  • culpritus [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Tim MAYOpoulos

    https://nitter.1d4.us/pic/orig/enc/bWVkaWEvRnJNbVdUbVhzQmtlU05LLnBuZw==

    :screm-a::aaaa::aaaa::aaaa::aaaa::aaaa::aaaa::aaaa::aaaa::aaaa::aaaa:

  • solaranus
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

  • MaoistLandlord [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I don’t get how this works. You would need to keep money in the bank for the same amount to be insured. What’s the point of keeping, say, $5 million at SVB if you lose it and just get $5 million? You haven’t made any profits.

    Unless they’re suggesting that they’ll reinvest/loan out the money, and if they make money the depositor profits via interest, and if they lose money, the government will just refund them the original amount

    • Circle_circle [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      In the scenario, the person can either put 5 mil in SVB, lose it, and then get it all back without any worry or they can put that 5 mil into another bank and if it failed, they would lose that 5 mil.

      • MaoistLandlord [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ah okay. That makes sense. But didn’t the fed seize it? I thought once that happens they’re gonna get liquidated and normal operations stop