• Judge denies Federal Trade Commission bid to block gaming deal

  • UK’s merger veto bars closing, though companies are appealing

Microsoft Corp. won a court’s okay to move forward with its $69 billion deal to buy Activision Blizzard Inc., defeating an effort by the US Federal Trade Commission to block the largest ever gaming deal.

The decision by Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley in San Francisco means Microsoft could close its merger with Activision ahead of a July 18 deadline everywhere except for the UK, which vetoed the deal in May.

Microsoft has said it struck the deal to acquire Activision in order to add mobile games — an area where it has virtually no presence. Activision owns King, the maker of Candy Crush. The combination will vault Microsoft to the No. 3 slot among global video-game companies behind China’s Tencent Holdings Ltd., the publisher of League of Legends, and game console rival Sony Corp., Microsoft had said.

Activision rose as much as 6% on the news, and was trading up 4.4% to $86.31 at 11:08 a.m. in New York. Microsoft fell less than 1% to $330.06.

“We’re grateful to the court in San Francisco for this quick and thorough decision and hope other jurisdictions will continue working towards a timely resolution,” Microsoft President Brad Smith said. “As we’ve demonstrated consistently throughout this process, we are committed to working creatively and collaboratively to address regulatory concerns.”

Activision said the deal will benefit consumers and workers.

The merger “will enable competition rather than allow entrenched market leaders to continue to dominate our rapidly growing industry,” Activision Chief Executive Officer Bobby Kotick said.

“We are disappointed in this outcome given the clear threat this merger poses to open competition in cloud gaming, subscription services, and consoles. In the coming days we’ll be announcing our next step to continue our fight to preserve competition and protect consumers,” FTC spokesman Douglas Farrar said in an email.

In a decision, Scott Corley denied the FTC’s preliminary injunction, which sought to block the deal on the grounds it would harm gamers. At a June hearing, the FTC argued Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision would harm competition since the combined company would have an incentive to withhold key titles, like top-selling shooter game Call of Duty, from rival consoles and subscription services.

The lawsuit was part of an effort by FTC Chair Lina Khan to more aggressively police mergers, particularly those by the biggest tech platforms. Since President Joe Biden appointed her to helm the agency in June 2021, the FTC has killed mergers between Lockheed Martin Corp. and Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings Inc. as well as Nvidia Corp.’s bid to buy SoftBank Group Corp.’s Arm.

Microsoft’s paltry mobile gaming presence will see a boost after the tech giant rolls in Activision Blizzard’s Candy Crush and Call of Duty Mobile. Mobile gaming is the fastest-growing segment of the gaming industry and is valued at $92 billion — half of the global gaming market, according to analytics firm NewZoo.

However, critics have concerns that Microsoft will use its new leverage to disadvantage competitors like Sony by decreasing access to its blockbuster titles or publishing more games exclusively to Xbox and PC.

people must be blind to not see this merger happened because microsoft wanted more exclusives for xbox, looks like playstation lost the console war. starcraft 3 soon?

  • sovietknuckles [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley in San Francisco

    Don't let the fact that this is a 2022 Biden appointee distract you from your moral obligation to :i-voted:

  • barrbaric [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah dude it was totally just to get into mobile games, that's why you bought the entirety of acti-blizz and not just king on its own. Who the fuck is stupid enough to believe this garbage.

  • Yurt_Owl
    ·
    1 year ago

    Microsoft has absolutely obliterated everything they bought out as well as its own IP. Sony for all its flaws at least make good games sometimes. Microsoft hasn't made fuck all since the 360.

    • Fuckass
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • thoro [none/use name]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don't play multiplayer much anymore, so this might be a hot take but... Halo peaked with Combat Evolved in single player at least.

        It was an extremely well made sci-fi blockbuster for its time that revolutionized console FPS. Halo 2 tried to say more than it could about religion, struggled to balance its duel protagonists, and was unfinished. Halo 3 straight up dropped that theme and the Arbiter (the more interesting character) in general for pretty dumb bombast. ODST was alright. Reach was the best since 1. Halo 4 was schlock that required extended media to fully understand. I haven't played the other two, admittedly.

        • SerLava [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          4 was such a fucking disappointment because they developed a pretty good Halo multiplayer game.

          But then the fucking Marketing people made them literally remove Slayer from matchmaking and replaced it with a Call of Duty load out+killstreak drop+instant respawn system that made the game absolutely fucking mindless and boring, with no form of map control or the ability to know what the opponent might be carrying. Horrible.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agreed. I almost threw my controller (I did not) when the credits rolled on Halo 2 half way through the story.

      • Yurt_Owl
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well theg saw to it that Halo was destroyed and Gears just isn't as big as it used to be.

      • macabrett
        ·
        1 year ago

        fakenews is how I found out about this button lmao

  • BabaIsPissed [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not saying this is definetly how it'll play out but I could see Sony getting away relatively unscathed from this. Just like Nintendo they seem to "get" what makes a system seller in a way Microsoft does not.

    • Fuckass
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      deleted by creator

  • FlakesBongler [they/them]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, if Microsoft does with Activision what they did with Bethesda and Arkane...

    • Fuckass
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • Deadend [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        The game industry at large, and games pass.

        The plan is to get game pass to be THE WAY then crank up the price.

        The SaaS model, the Netflix model.

          • Deadend [he/him]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Uber made a bunch of people extremely rich.

            The difference between the con version and the monopoly version is only “How hard would it be for someone else to make a knock-off that is legally distinct?”

            With Uber it was easy, Netflix it was harder, Microsoft games much harder as the whole point is scale, and that’s EXPENSIVE.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah. Can't wait. Steam is already a monopoly disaster. I hate this shit so much. gaming is like the last thing I have and it's just getting more and more manipulative and monetized. Like hte best team FPS shooter in the last few years didn't come from a major studio, didn't have thousands working on it, didn't have half a million in budget and half a million more in advertising; It's a 3 man job developed in their spare time and it blows anything the big companies have made lately out of the water. Ugh.

          And Msft is working towards taking Windows off your PC and putting it on their servers so they can have total, absolute control. I fucking hate the future.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    freeze-gamer with the attention span of goldfish across reddit-logo are jerking off until they're ejaculating powder over this.

    Why?

    Because they believe it will mean more/better/cheaper treats. so-true

  • VILenin [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine thinking that the courts would side against the interests of capital