• Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.ml
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Causality issues aside, yes I would. Makes a big difference if I found out I had 40+ years left vs 5 years left.

    Wouldn't have mattered either way then lol.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can I change it?

    I got a scan that detected cancer which I was later able to get removed. That cancer would have probably killed me in five years.

    If I get told that I'll die of cancer in twenty years, I'm going to deal with it in ten years.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml
    ·
    2 months ago

    If I knew the reason, chances are it would show "tried to cheat death" with a very close death time. I'd better off not knowing it; because I would definetly try to cheat against it. My lack of knowledge about it will let me live longer.

  • Mothra@mander.xyz
    ·
    2 months ago

    Of course I would, then I would hate myself for it. But I know I'd hate myself even more if I had the chance to know and not take it

  • CommunistBear [he/him]
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, I'd go for it. I already know that it's inevitable. Being able to not fuck over my loved ones by having certain things in order would make things easier for them.

  • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
    ·
    2 months ago

    No, because as soon as I accept that knowledge, the wave function collapses and my future becomes deterministic.

  • Majestic@lemmy.ml
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yes. Though I wouldn’t want to know the exact day if I could help that. Knowing the year or month would be enough to plan. To have a will. To say the things I want to say to those I care about. To make peace with the end. To do what I can of a bucket list and to feel a bit more secure up to that point not worrying about death.

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ah, but if you decided to end it sooner after you'd seen that it would be a long ways off, then you'd fail in such a way that made you either unable or unwilling to try again.