"We found a woman that agrees with us. Please be gaslit into submission like the hivemnd you are"
As an AFAB I can't tell you how many times I got the "Most woman don't care about womans rights" talk from the men in my life. They will try to make you feel crazy. This is why I get so fucked off when people say things like "why does she put up with that?!" she puts up with it because growing up female is like being brainwashed into a cult. You're made to feel stupid and hysterical for speaking up.
When men in chud families get out of line they are often compared to women as a deeply shaming implication of weakness and insubordination, too.
As an AFAB I can't tell you how many times I got the "Most woman don't care about womans rights" talk from the men in my life.
Often this is sadly true (41% of American women identify as 'pro life' for instance) and I think it's because, as you said:
growing up female is like being brainwashed into a cult. You're made to feel stupid and hysterical for speaking up.
I've literally had young women tell me unprompted that they identify as "Anti feminist", as if I'd be impressed by it or some bs. I know plenty of young women that go to chuches that I know have sexist beliefs.
she's such a dork, I feel kinda bad for her, she like rated herself a 5 or some shit like that, imagine advocating for a system in which you don't even feel like you can love yourself...
The Objective/10 rating system for living human beings that have nuance and facets has always been a shitty and alienating thing to me from the first time I heard of it.
Facebook started as The Zucc doing Objective/10 creepshots of his classmates.
Recently found out about r/truerateme and it's pretty much the worst thing ever. Basically you're not allowed to rate anyone lower than 3 or higher than 6.9 because or you'll get banned for over/under rating because it's supposed to be "objective" and follow a "normal distribution". They also have a rating guide with all the features and stuff and you're supposed to follow that so you have a bunch of people going on about negative canthal tilt or whatever.
ratings are supposed to follow a normal distribution
My guy, that's just called rigging the outcome
Basically you're not allowed to rate anyone lower than 3 or higher than 6.9 because or you'll get banned for over/under rating because it's supposed to be "objective" and follow a "normal distribution"
"Objectivity" is such a totemic magic word for bazingas and I hate that.
yeah, I refuse to do it, but to rate yourself that on that system is still something else...
i thought someone with the name "Pearl Davis" was like a 60-year-old child-beating enthusiast
altho i'm sure she's pro child beating bc it "never did her any harm" either
Pearl is in for a rude awakening when she finds out the incel Trad cath type freaks won't treat her as "one of the good ones"
Face-eating leopard enthusiast is super pleased to throw faces in front of her face and never expects her face to be eaten by face-eating leopards.
Giving this person way more benefit of the doubt than she deserves, she might be actually convinced that leopards eating faces is the order of the world, and that getting her face eaten is a small price for whatever she thinks the benefit is.
Fascism is a death cult. Maybe you're right and she wants to proverbially ride shiny and chrome to Valhalla.
Idk it's confusing with her since she is so much like Andrew Tate it feels like she's doing it as a grift and isn't as ideologically motivated.
I could be wrong though. After all we've people like Candice Owens and Laura Loomer.
