• PaulWall [he/him]
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 years ago

    Uh yeah we probably are given the fact that we allow ourselves to even conceive of greatness. anything you think of as great you do so thru your capacity as a human. therefore all greatness is human greatness. there isn’t anything outside the human perspective

    • RandomWords [he/him]
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      4 years ago

      wow. i'm not even a vegetarian, but this is a great argument for becoming one. fuck off.

      • PaulWall [he/him]
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        dude i’m a fucking vegetarian haha bc it’s our responsibility as the only linguistically capable beings to advocate for those not

        • the_river_cass [she/her]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          the only linguistically capable beings

          this is almost certainly not true. various corvids and apes absolutely have a capacity to learn language while dolphins are incredibly sophisticated in this regard, communicating with each other in ways we are only just beginning to piece together. but this is I guess the point about the hubris of this sentiment: we do not understand the capacities of animals nearly so well to make statements like these.

          • PaulWall [he/him]
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 years ago

            our lack of understanding them is precisely why we have the responsibility to advocate for them is my point. that lack of understanding comes from their lack of linguistic capabilities that would allow them to prove they have subjectivity. because they can’t prove it, just like we can’t prove each other has it; we should take the benefit of the doubt and protect all potential subjectivity

            • the_river_cass [she/her]
              ·
              4 years ago

              I have linguistic capabilities. put me in a strange place where no one speaks a language I share and I might well struggle to prove my own subjectivity, especially were that subjectivity doubted by my captors and the burden of proof placed upon me. in fact, we know this because experiments like these were used to "prove" the lack of subjectivity of Africans.

              but again, this is my point about hubris: we regularly assume we know things that we do not, including the lack of subjectivity, or the lack of linguistic capabilities of animals - or, indeed, of other people.

              I think the most unsettling thing about your posts in this thread is the way you've taken white supremacist arguments, changed the subjects to humans and the objects to animals, but left the fundamentally bad reasoning that led to such bullshit wholly intact. humans do not need to be supreme in order for the continuation of our species to be worthwhile - we merely need to be. but we must also extend the same courtesy to the other living things with which we share the globe.

              • PaulWall [he/him]
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 years ago

                it is factual that humans have superior capacity than the rest of the animals on the planet, it is not factual that white people have superior capacity than brown people.

                • the_river_cass [she/her]
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  much more important than the factual weakness of a statement like that is why you're so attached to the notion of superiority (whatever that actually means) in the first place.

                  • PaulWall [he/him]
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    it superiority of our technology and capacities to make technology. the concept of superiority isn’t bad in itself. communism is superior to capitalism no?

          • PaulWall [he/him]
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            4 years ago

            material conditions wouldn’t be able to provide proper protein sources. ideally we would just be mass producing artificial or lab grown meat using renewable energy

            • Speaker [e/em/eir]
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 years ago

              I didn't ask "why isn't everyone vegan?", I asked "why aren't you vegan?"

              • PaulWall [he/him]
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 years ago

                that was my personal reason, i meant my material conditions

                • Speaker [e/em/eir]
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  But... you're vegetarian? What does protein have to do with it? Like you get all your protein from eggs or something? A cup of beans is 16g of protein vs the 7 grams in an egg. I don't follow.

                  • PaulWall [he/him]
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    you’re probably right that i could find a way to be completely vegan, i live with my parents however and large changes to my diet would have to ge accessible thru the pantry we keep regularly

            • p_sharikov [he/him]
              ·
              4 years ago

              material conditions wouldn’t be able to provide proper protein sources.

              Why? It takes way fewer resources to grow plant proteins than animals.

        • RandomWords [he/him]
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          4 years ago

          well then you should research the word perspective.