linked article is what has convinced me he's got it in the bag. the wapo/nyt libs are exactly as insufferable as they were in 2016 and the results will the identical. he'll win for all the same reasons he did the first time and libs, having learned absolutely nothing, will make all the same complaints and tear their hair out trying to figure out what happened. watching the most performatively irritating people on earth eat crow is going to be absolutely chefs-kiss

and i don't even have to feel bad about laughing because kamala's policies are literally identical to trumps, so its not even like theres gonna be additional palestinians/trans people/women who are suffering because of it

Death to America

  • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I will spare you the suspense: I am endorsing Kamala Harris for president, because I like elections and want to keep having them.

    visible-disgust

    And I happen to care about the people who are already here, in this world.

    Well, some of those people a lot more than others

    • quarrk [he/him]
      ·
      1 month ago

      I will spare you the suspense: I am endorsing Kamala Harris for president, because I like elections and want to keep having them.

      Reminder: she’s talking about the candidate who practically skipped the primary process and was coronated by the party

    • Mardoniush [she/her]
      ·
      1 month ago

      But why does she want to keep having elections, if policy is unbendable?

    • 2Password2Remember [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      1 month ago

      yeah im a Certified Election EnjoyerTM. no i havent got any idea of the difference between democracy and elections, why do you ask?

      Death to America

    • REgon [they/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It's wild how often liberals will say they "support" something while actively working against it. Support/care in their mind just means they feel sad about it I guess