i dont know, maybe im off base completely, but this is very reactionary, no? can someone in good faith argue something even remotely similar to this and be right?

edit: https://twitter.com/PurelyPurgatory/status/1319664557791629312?s=20 heres this take too by someone with hammer/sickle in their bio? WTF?! i dont wanna feel like im throwing ppl under the bus but im legitimately shocked by this.

  • wtypstanaccount04 [he/him]
    3·
    4 years ago

    https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/what_happens_when_you_educate_liberals_about_white_privilege

    Intersectionality without class is worse than useless, it is actively damaging.

        • qublics [they/them,she/her]
          ·
          4 years ago

          This is clearly a "without milk" type of situation: :zizek-fuck:
          Thesis: LGBTQ people are cancer.
          Antithesis: White people are cancer.
          Synthesis: Black Nazbol.

          edit: /r/stupidpol are far worse than class reductionists.

    • artangels [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      this was my takeaway, they still are relying on the assumption that poverty is still, at its core, a reflection of somebody's worth and ability to "work hard."

    • CatherineTheSoSo [any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      It's not intersectionality though. Intersectionality would be at least wondering whether the homeless white person is oppressed along some other axis like sexual orientation, gender, mental health, whatever.