• Chomsky [comrade/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Funny thing is communists DONT year for violent revolution, they yearn for a more egalitarian society, but fucking capitalists just murder them for even wanting it.

    • Magjee [any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Yep

      People use the means which are left to them

      ~

      Also America was founded on violent revolution

      ...and genocide

      • Chomsky [comrade/them]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        Not to mention the other liberal poster child: France. Violent revolution, mass murder, dictatorship world war. That just went fucking peachy.

          • Chomsky [comrade/them]
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 years ago

            Idk about cool and good. I don't think anyone should glorify violence, but it was necessary.

                • Value_Form2 [none/use name]
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 years ago

                  That's literally what they do, they push it to the peripheries where an underclass is barely paid to do it for them, this applies to animal farming as well as imperialism.

                  • Chomsky [comrade/them]
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    If you are reading history and conclude anglos have generally been anti violence, you've got the book upside down or something.

                • AlexandairBabeuf [they/them]
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  Any read of F-R that doesn't start with "good" is poisoned by 18th century english propaganda, CMV

                  • Chomsky [comrade/them]
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    The revolution was good, but I am firmly in the violence is a necessary evil camp. Bully me about it all you want.

                    • AlexandairBabeuf [they/them]
                      arrow-down
                      1
                      ·
                      4 years ago

                      A necessary, unavoidable pre-requisite. I don't know why you'd feel the need to hand-wring over it unless you have substantive criticism of the application of violence in the revolution.

        • Magjee [any]
          ·
          4 years ago

          I did like some parts of it 😅

    • CommieGirl69 [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      yea lol

      like we just want the revolution it's the bourgeoisie that doesn't let us have it without violence

    • shitshow [any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      It's almost like any attempts to change the status quo through "legitimate channels" get's met with right wing violence.

      • Equeon [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Including literally "JUST VOTE", even that most milquetoast and nonviolent of actions has resulted in genuine violence or threats of violence for decades

    • Equeon [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      I'd like this to be the actual intention behind the original tweet, but I know it isn't.

  • ChapoBapo [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Anyone who accepts the violent status quo is garbage

  • Baader [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Guess one has to be privileged enough not to experience violence and keep the opression alive instead of guiottening the 1%. Breadtubers be crazy.

    • LaughingLion [any, any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Exactly, they claim they want revolution so it must be the violence they are against and that is because they have the privilege not to be subjected to the violence of the state or the threat of it on a constant basis.

      • invalidusernamelol [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Patiently waiting for the American bourgeoisie to peacefully eradicate themselves and yelling at anyone who goes near them.

  • mao [he/him]
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    deleted by creator

          • angry_dyke [she/her]
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 years ago

            If I stand by and watch you get sexually assaulted, all the while shrugging my shoulders and saying, "well, that's men for you", can I call myself anti-rape? What if I turn that into a career? Ellis, contrapoints, Dan Olson, they're all trash.

        • AntiNouns [it/its]
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 years ago

          do you seriously think there are millionaire breadtubers

          • angry_dyke [she/her]
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            4 years ago

            Yeah, I do. You know their Patreon numbers are somewhat public, right?

            • camaron28 [he/him]
              ·
              4 years ago

              I mean, their expenses aren't. Also she lives in LA if i remember correctly.

            • AntiNouns [it/its]
              ·
              4 years ago

              I know, that doesn't mean that they have net worths of 1 million or more. Even the for big breadtubers, they have living and production expenses, and haven't been getting lots of patreon money for a long time. Massive Youtuber Mr Beast has a reported net worth of 18 million dollars and he have endorsement deals and stuff and uploads way more often than average breadtubers. do you think they're living like scrooge mcduck off of patreon backers? I don't even think contrapoints is a millionaire off of her patreon, definitely not Lindsay Ellis and there's no fucking chance Dan Olson is.

            • SteveHasBunker [he/him]
              ·
              4 years ago

              I mean contest probably is.

              The other two, I don’t know their incomes off hand but I don’t think they’re quite near as high as Contra. They’re well off for sure, but idk if they’re “rich”

          • Rodentsteak [he/him]
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 years ago

            She makes more than a junior doctor does here, and that's before factoring in ad revenue. (And book/Merch sales) She's solidly pmc

      • redthebaron [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        but skull boy though i would say like a 99% with a shaun is forgiven for his crime of being born in terf island exception

          • redthebaron [he/him]
            ·
            4 years ago

            like the british tend to be better than americans on politics if we could just find out what the fuck is turning every one in the island into terfs we could just stop having to think about the british for a bit

  • ultraviolet [she/her]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Nobody wants violent revolution but no capitalist is going to just give up power peacefully so it must be taken by force. Fucking libs.

  • Odo [any]
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 years ago

    It's one thing to understand that revolution will require violence and another to be obsessed with the violence that will happen during a revolutionary period. Some comrades fit the latter description and I don't think that's a healthy place to be in.

    • BobaFettyWap [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      We'd all love for those who control the means of production to yield them because we all voted or whatever.

      Were also not idiots and know that will never happen

          • Mardoniush [she/her]
            ·
            4 years ago

            They don't currently have the ability to use kinetic impactors, they won't for at least another decade, If we've taken US military bases we'll have ASAT weapons, and if there's a revolution it will come with military revolts. so we too will have rocks to drop.

              • Mardoniush [she/her]
                ·
                edit-2
                4 years ago

                Uh..as far as I know the only armed Space Station ever was Saylut 3. They absolutely could do a self nuke, but that would be difficult given how the system is set up.

                Again, MAD involves people. Some of those people will be revolutionaries and we will have control of those facilities. Worst case scenario we can Kessler LEO pretty easily and then nothing is getting through..

    • ProfessionalSlacker
      ·
      4 years ago

      That's a fair statement but it's an overly charitable reading of what these people are suggesting.

      • Odo [any]
        ·
        4 years ago

        yea, looks like pre-election anxiety is giving Lindsey a strong case of the libs

  • VILenin [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    I hear a lotta talk about the violence of the revolution, but virtually nothing about the violence of the state.

    Noooo please don't cut the king's head off, that's a violence!

    Would love to see these people hop in a time machine to call russian peasants violent authoritarians

    • Eredin [none/use name]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Lol they don't need a time machine for that, the western cultural sphere has at several occasions depicted the Romanovs as innocent and undeserving of their fate.

    • BlueMagaChud [any]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      Exactly, they're reifying a counterbalance to justify remaining in the status quo. This is entirely because of this position's moral superiority, of course, not because they'll use any justification for the defense of their currently excellent material conditions.

  • SteveHasBunker [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    I don’t think either of these people openly IDed as “Breadtube”, they both just do media crit and had politics a bit left of center.