The mods have shown how they do not care about the posters opinions they just ban people whenever they fgeel like it. Take a look at the mod logs if you care youll see these weird ban reasons like "wrecking" and "sectarianism". The reason why these terms exist is to attack the people with different opinions and the way they get silenced is by the power the mods and admins use. Ive asked so many times for democratic moderation why is it that we cant have it? If the mods gave a shit about their "socialism" as much as their "democratic control over the means of production" wouldnt they give the posters even have the power to influence bans?

  • socialist [she/her]
    hexagon
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 years ago

    i guess its in good faith when assad kills 500 000 people to be a dictator and is a capitalist how could i ever not go along with this its not like this could have been avoided

    • QuillQuote [they/them]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      nah doing this smarmy passive aggressive shit instead of making real arguments, articulating your points, and refuting the claims of others you say are false is absolutely bad faith garbage.

      Like, I'm not even an assad stan why are you bringing this to me?

      do you see the problem with posting and arguing so angrily with so many people at once? please log off

      • socialist [she/her]
        hexagon
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        4 years ago

        There are no arguements to make either you support assad plunging syria into the civil war because he didnt give ANYTHING to the people or youre an imperialist