Hi Bill Mays Here with a BRAND NEW MEGATHREAD
The powerful restorer that’s healthy for your home. Use it in the bathroom. Put the shine back in your shower. It dissolves calcium, rust, and water stains on contact!
AMAC and ACAB, sort by new
Yesterday's megathread
Follow the ChapoChat twitter account
THEORY; it’s good for what ails you (all kinds of tendencies inside!)
COMMUNITY CALENDAR - AN EXPERIMENT IN PROMOTING USER ORGANIZING EFFORTS
Join the fresh and beautiful batch of new comms:
You typically won't win anything in a straight up "debate" and even if you're right, there's a good chance you won't look great since liberals will fill in any gaps with their own explanations/"common knowledge" derived from the usual propaganda and you won't even know it. It's best to steer clear from those types of conversations.
What I find much more effective rhetorically (when talking to liberals mostly) is "yes and...."ing them back to the fundamentals while avoiding the hotwords that will derail everything. Once they have an understanding of the fundamental basis of your viewpoint, then you can move on to things that are more controversial.
deleted by creator
You shouldn't directly be discussing "soviet" "socialist" "communist" anything. Those words and topics are forbidden until they show a real interest in learning more about socialism and challenging their preconceptions.
An example of what I mean by that is when they say something like like how "rent control fucks up the housing market" or whatever, instead of arguing directly against that, just passively agree and move on to your better point: "Yeah I guess you have a point that rent control is an insufficient solution that has its own baggage, but I'd say that we could do a lot more by actually decommodifying housing entirely by doing [these things]". Hopefully that'll lead to a much more productive discussion that can challenge capitalism in their minds but you still sound "cool and pragmatic" which libs love.