I've heard that he's been doxxed and people are trying to get him expelled from the DSA?

As far as I can tell, it's for trying to dunk on someone with this tweet.

Is he in the wrong in some way I can't see, a victim of overreaction, or do I just not have the full picture?

  • Fakename_Bill [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    So there are people who actually unironically want woke segregation? It's not just a hyperbole strawman made up by stupidpol types?

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      People keep saying that the screenshots he posted are "out of context" but nobody seems to want to post the actual context. Doesn't help that the person who made the segregation post tweets so much that I scrolled for 10 minutes without finding a post that was made only days ago.

      • PaulWall [he/him]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        i think if context allows you to support segregation then doesn’t that by definition make you literally reactionary. When you change what should be an a priori opposition to fucking segregation into an opposition that has to be confirmed via context, you literally are reacting to context in order to determine your position on segregation.

        the very question of “context?” within regards to segregation is reactionary.

      • GothWhitlam [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        Reminds me of an old race, ethnicity and racism teacher I had at uni.

        She kept claiming that 'Australia is a melting pot for all cultures in the world'.

        The classes response was essentially that it's not a very good pot if everything mixes together to be white.

        Integration implies that Culture B is becoming Culture A. Perhaps a better word is needed, something like 'fusion', where Culture B joins Culture A to become something new entirely, Culture C.

        Our current system just saps and destroys the culture of anything 'integrated'