Yeah, but just still do it. Had a discussion with a comrade a while ago which in its core was about that tension of power of speech:
Option 1 there are a multitude of individual universes, so you don't know how and what the others feel or see, though: there is some kind of mediation between them depending on material conditions and such (which shapes your conscious). There are therefore multiple Truths
Option 2 there is one objective truth (besides scientific marxism) which means there is to be one Truth to be spread and the power of the powerful is to hold up this objective Truth.
I am the opinion the perspective of option 1 is much more useful and correct, it also makes clear that naturally the companies, the liberal state and such try to push their perspective (and with the power they got it is easier than to push others), but it underlines that there are more perspectives and that it is actual might which makes you heard more or less.
In much the same sense I believe we shouldn't think about whether the bourgeoisie is going to subvert our slogans (they will, even if it doesn't work) but use them and our concepts.
deleted by creator
Ooff yeah. You're probably right.
I'll fully admit it's just a dumb thing that popped into my head lol
deleted by creator
thank you but if you ask the @VolcelPolice I'm not that pure
It's sad but it's true
deleted by creator
Yeah, but just still do it. Had a discussion with a comrade a while ago which in its core was about that tension of power of speech:
Option 1 there are a multitude of individual universes, so you don't know how and what the others feel or see, though: there is some kind of mediation between them depending on material conditions and such (which shapes your conscious). There are therefore multiple Truths
Option 2 there is one objective truth (besides scientific marxism) which means there is to be one Truth to be spread and the power of the powerful is to hold up this objective Truth.
I am the opinion the perspective of option 1 is much more useful and correct, it also makes clear that naturally the companies, the liberal state and such try to push their perspective (and with the power they got it is easier than to push others), but it underlines that there are more perspectives and that it is actual might which makes you heard more or less.
In much the same sense I believe we shouldn't think about whether the bourgeoisie is going to subvert our slogans (they will, even if it doesn't work) but use them and our concepts.