The title is The Second Russian Revolution by Alex Roxburgh, published by BBC books lol

  • No_Values [none/use name]
    hexagon
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    and how maverick Boris Yeltsin, backed by the people, suffered for being one step ahead

  • CoralMarks [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    maverick Boris Yeltsin, backed by the people, suffered for being one step ahead

    lmao

    Wow, and they wanted 16 pounds for that? Damn.

    • No_Values [none/use name]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      It's from 1991 so that would be something like £35 today, pretty sure it's from a charity shop, the person who got it for me is fairly apolitical(but votes labour and has class consciousness) but probably just saw it and was like No_Values is always rating about that commie stuff, he'll like it, without look into it's veracity too much lol

      • invalidusernamelol [he/him]
        ·
        4 years ago

        I bought a communist friend a Chomsky book back when I was still a radlib. Is there any hope for redemption?

        • No_Values [none/use name]
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          I'm an anarchist myself comrade, but :chompsky: and his whole 'justified hierarchies' muddied the waters quite a bit, get them some Bookchin or Kropotkin( Ursula K. Le Guin for something non-theory)

      • CoralMarks [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        That is understandable, I don't think many people are aware of the intricacies concerning the USSR anyways.
        And when it comes to presents I always try to have an attitude of "It is the thought that counts", and this sounds like at least that is the case here.

        • No_Values [none/use name]
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          4 years ago

          Definitely, there was a decent level of thought behind it, I really appreciated it, even if the content within is dogshit

  • LeninsRage [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    Ligachev constantly suffers unfair smears and is scapegoated as a hardliner. In reality Ligachev was a moderate who supported much of perestroika until Gorbachev went way too far and even started attacking the Party.

    • LeninWalksTheWorld [any]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Yeah seriously poor Yegor got portrayed in the west as some sort of arch-stalinist hell bent on the destruction of reforms but in reality he probably had the better reform vision than Gorbachev did.

  • funkfresh [they/them]
    ·
    4 years ago

    lol you're not actually going to read that are you. If the answer is yes and you haven't read Settlers yet.....

    • No_Values [none/use name]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Haha probably not, it's in my bathroom atm(in case of another toilet paper shortage)

      Still could be good for some examples of neo-liberal misconstruing methods