The WHO chartered something called the Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response, and yesterday they released their second report. It's not too long, so I read the whole thing to judge for myself how bad the headlines are. Here's my summary of its contents:
-
The whole world was totally unprepared
-
Measurements like the Global Health Security Index turned out to be bullshit
-
Social media has created an infodemic
-
Inequalities everywhere have been exacerbated
-
Poorer countries are unjustly being left without access to PPE and vaccines
-
Precarious and informal workers in wealthy countries are suffering disproportionately
-
"Public health containment measures should have been implemented immediately in any country with a likely case. They were not."
-
Some countries (unnamed) sacrificed public health and lives to make the line go up
-
Overall, the Asia-Pacific countries and the Africa CDC have been doing a decent job
-
The global supply chain is weak
-
The WHO should have used the term "pandemic" sooner than March
-
The WHO is underfunded and forced to waste too much time fundraising
Also buried in the report is this single criticism of China:
Public health measures could have been applied more forcefully by local and national health authorities in China in January.
Guess which parts the Western media chose to focus on?
CNN: China and WHO acted too slowly to contain Covid-19, says independent panel
The Week: Independent panel slams China and WHO over Covid-19 response
AP: China, WHO should have acted quicker to stop pandemic
Sydney Morning Herald: 'Signal was ignored': Independent inquiry criticises China and WHO over COVID
Seattle Times: Panel: China, WHO should have acted quicker to stop pandemic
Remember when the imperialist media was criticizing China for acting too aggressively and authoritarian with its lockdowns? Lmao
couple articles I saw about liang referenced others who were arrested for the same thing, and he was arrested for it. plus it took a whistleblower before people got their shit together.
id be willing to believe the whistleblower bridged the gap between scared intimidated local officials trying to not be murdered for causing a problem and the national folks who realized "oh shit, this is a problem" and then they punished her because WTF else is one supposed to do to messengers when you've got a stratified power structure and illusion of a competent benevolent state to maintain?
I'd be interested to see those.
Yes, but charges were dropped and he never spend a minute in jail.
Patently untrue. Refer to the timeline.
:what: :bruh-moment: