I know I wouldn't be able to turn people there into communists on a sub literally dedicated to capitalism, I do know however I could make them aware of class conflict. To me agitprop should be like a ladder (it's by the way the shit I learned in marketing, which is basically propagandizing too). You got to start where people are at. Otherwise, they will not be able to climb the ladder. If you want any response other than "fuck off tankie scum" you better be prepared to use the ladder. Another chapo actually caught on to this and replied with a Marx quote. And like that going a step up on the ladder so to say.
a great rubric is to hypothesize a response from a regular that criticizes your comment with the party line, and then word your comment in such a way that the party line seems like a ridiculous counterargument
which is why that comment's so great. someone replying to argue NAP this or truly free market that would look absolutely ridiculous, and get clowned on
this happens here all the time, even now. all this nonsense about 'buying GME is praxis' is highly sus as is the 'spend your money on organizing' take
case study in absolutely fire agitprop
play to the crowd and plant a seed
we would all do well to read comments around here with a similarly critical lens
I know I wouldn't be able to turn people there into communists on a sub literally dedicated to capitalism, I do know however I could make them aware of class conflict. To me agitprop should be like a ladder (it's by the way the shit I learned in marketing, which is basically propagandizing too). You got to start where people are at. Otherwise, they will not be able to climb the ladder. If you want any response other than "fuck off tankie scum" you better be prepared to use the ladder. Another chapo actually caught on to this and replied with a Marx quote. And like that going a step up on the ladder so to say.
100%
a great rubric is to hypothesize a response from a regular that criticizes your comment with the party line, and then word your comment in such a way that the party line seems like a ridiculous counterargument
which is why that comment's so great. someone replying to argue NAP this or truly free market that would look absolutely ridiculous, and get clowned on
this happens here all the time, even now. all this nonsense about 'buying GME is praxis' is highly sus as is the 'spend your money on organizing' take