Honestly I'm not sure about the controlled demolition theory. The amount of coordination that would require is pretty big, I don't think you could keep that a secret really.
Also what's the point of killing WTC 7 too? Wouldn't the two biggest buildings be enough? Also that video doesn't really look like any controlled demolition I've seen.
I mean there's definitely a lot of shady shit about the official story but I don't think they blew it up themselves.
Well, we do know sniffer dogs were removed from the building in the days leading up to the attacks. We also know that buildings only collapse in their own footprint in controlled demolition. Comparing damage to the Empire State Building from a previous plane crash and the plane hitting the towers, we should be able to see that a plane alone cannot take down a building.
As for Building 7, it was being used as the FOC for 9/11. That was where all the planning and data shit went down. It was demolished because it contained too much evidence and taking it out would be the perfect way to ensure no one could figure out what happened. And it wasn’t kept a secret. I’ve interviewed former CIA members in private about the events of 9/11. One of them was one of the people who staffed Building 7. He told me all about how they planned the escape in advance.
I'll be honest my dude, that sounds like a bunch of conspiracy theory nonsense that I honestly have no chance of verifying for myself.
We also know that buildings only collapse in their own footprint in controlled demolition. Comparing damage to the Empire State Building from a previous plane crash and the plane hitting the towers, we should be able to see that a plane alone cannot take down a building.
Do we know that? I sure as shit can't really know that for sure. Are you a civil engineer / architect yourself or are you just repeating what other people said?
Honestly I'm not sure about the controlled demolition theory. The amount of coordination that would require is pretty big, I don't think you could keep that a secret really.
Also what's the point of killing WTC 7 too? Wouldn't the two biggest buildings be enough? Also that video doesn't really look like any controlled demolition I've seen.
I mean there's definitely a lot of shady shit about the official story but I don't think they blew it up themselves.
Well, we do know sniffer dogs were removed from the building in the days leading up to the attacks. We also know that buildings only collapse in their own footprint in controlled demolition. Comparing damage to the Empire State Building from a previous plane crash and the plane hitting the towers, we should be able to see that a plane alone cannot take down a building.
As for Building 7, it was being used as the FOC for 9/11. That was where all the planning and data shit went down. It was demolished because it contained too much evidence and taking it out would be the perfect way to ensure no one could figure out what happened. And it wasn’t kept a secret. I’ve interviewed former CIA members in private about the events of 9/11. One of them was one of the people who staffed Building 7. He told me all about how they planned the escape in advance.
I'll be honest my dude, that sounds like a bunch of conspiracy theory nonsense that I honestly have no chance of verifying for myself.
Do we know that? I sure as shit can't really know that for sure. Are you a civil engineer / architect yourself or are you just repeating what other people said?