I don't think it was irrational for people to support him at a time when his social media made him seem like he could be a genuine contender, coming out as autistic despite the ridicule he knew he would get

everybody realized after the Destiny video that he had no idea what he was talking about and couldn't defend anything, barely anybody really supported him after that and his attempt to create a new party was a move so dumb I don't see how he could have any supporters left by that point

his candidacy wasn't ruined by his positions or anything like that, it was ruined by him being a shit candidate that was able to pretend to be decent when the spotlight wasn't really on him

his social media following could have really benefitted him had he ran a smart campaign, knew what he was talking about and stayed with the Democratic Party, so it's nonsense to make fun of that tbh

Joshua Collins is something to learn from if we're going to throw in on some electoralism

  1. know your positions
  2. know what you're talking about
  3. know your audience and what speaks to them
  4. network in real life, not just online (harder with COVID)
  5. run a real ground campaign (harder with COVID)
  6. don't depend on anything but honest to god hard work
  7. practice those debate skills

the next AOC could be here right now, it's just a matter of playing your campaign the right way

    • Nails [she/her,they/them]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      I am not under any illusions that social democracy will save anything but it's better than nothing

      the revolution won't happen tomorrow and may never imo because Americans are entirely too individualistic, even leftists, and have you ever tried to change an American? let alone tens of millions of them?

    • SerLava [he/him]
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      Even if it never does anything by itself, electing socialists can show our pathetic, capital-cucked, chud-filled, baby-brained country that there is actually an alternative to the conveyor belt they're on. Didn't like, fucking Lenin say it was a good idea to do some electoralism or am I thinking of someone else.

      • TheGazorpazorpfield [none/use name]
        ·
        4 years ago

        The problem is that we don’t have infinite resources to do everything. We have limited resources and losing an election is the complete loss of resources whereas if we used that money/manpower to build more permanent counter-hegemony we would be in a better place. Electoralism is useful as a background to get more people involved in building power.

        • Woly [any]
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 years ago

          We have limited resources and losing an election is the complete loss of resources whereas if we used that money/manpower to build more permanent counter-hegemony we would be in a better place.

          Who's actually doing this though? Outside of electoralism I don't see any organized movement towards supplanting the power structure that rules us.