Permanently Deleted
It pretty much is. they literally mass kill chicks for egg production and there's really no way to make eggs at industrial levels to feed people at the levels you claim to support without mass-harming animals. Your rhetoric also isn't great because it's filled with tautologies too, which is the problem you're rightfully criticizing. Saying they're "just eggs" is assuming your conclusion already much like the vegan rhetoric you're complaining about.
Don't willfully misinterpret my posts. I'm trying to respect you and give you quality responses but if you're going to smug post back at me then I'm going to fuck off and leave you to wallow in your dumbass sophistry. I'm obviously not talking about pro-life shit when I point out how chicks are mass-killed. I'm materially relating it to the rest of the production chain. Like, come on.
Do you realize how irrelevant this argument is? OK, you can theoretically raise chickens without pulverizing male chicks, whatever, but right now you are paying for male chicks to be pulverized.
I'm actually going to humor this whataboutism. Thanks to capitalism, electronics are problematic as you say. You can buy a Fairphone, but for almost all of the other hardware you rely on, even something like a car, you have no choice in the sourcing of materials. With veganism, you do have a choice to not buy the products of animal abuse, a choice you are consciously refusing to take because it would inconvenience you slightly. It's literally as simple as not paying for murder. Do you see the difference?
This belongs in UserUnion. Not main. Though I agree.
Your post sucked, but the mods gotta' stop removing shit. They just keep making things worse and you're right about that.
Yeah, you're right about that too. I don't know how we'd fix that problem because just mentioning it gets you further labelled a reactionary and more smug posts.
Very cool to have comments removed for "reactionary" anti-socialism
surely THAT will turn me socialist
no dipshit, the point is to clean up the garbage from the site, not to convince you to change your garbage opinions
the problem is you define reactionary as "anything i disagree with" and not-reactionary as "anything i agree with"
anti-veganism is reactionary, deal with it
Just because you say your arguments are compelling doesn't make them compelling. I, for example, am not compelled.
"If you replace word with different word" is the worst argument you can possibly make. Please be better than this.
Each word has a different meaning. Each word is beautiful. They're not interchangeable.
i wasnt making an argument, i was pointing out how stupid their post sounds to non-reactionaries
