• blobjim [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Yeah humans are such scum bags to animals and too many people have pets, so it would just be extremely cruel to not have free care. Having a pet should require a license though. Especially stuff like pet fish or harder to care for animals.

    • Diestar [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Having a pet should require a license

      Hard disagree on this

        • Diestar [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          It'll just turn into pets for rich people only

            • Diestar [he/him]
              ·
              4 years ago

              Yeah and those do fuck all to stop bad drivers and irresponsible hunters/fisherman but they get poor people in legal trouble. Look at gun licenses it's a weekend class and they never check up on you. It's a joke if you have the money

                • Diestar [he/him]
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  Fair enough I'm just sayin no one has evaluated my driving since I was a teen. No one's evaluated my shooting since I was 10. But it's a great pretext to harass poor people. If we're giving pets free healthcare your really just left with the purposely neglectful people

                • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  I fully agree with the concept but how would it be decided who can get a license?

    • veevee [she/her]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      Yeah people really need to know what they're doing, its inhumane to allow just anyone to take care of another animal.