Permanently Deleted
I would love it if you could get John DeLancie to play a Q-like figure (but not literally Q) for a movie similar to the pilot of TNG. Only instead of forcing Picard to defend humanity, he makes someone portraying Obama has to defend that America is a "good" country.
Of course he fails because America is awful so Q snaps his fingers and wipes out this shithole country...
It's been known for a while, although lacking in hard evidence past Frederick Brennan's posting and the obvious 8kun move and subsequent change in the Q writing style.
It's not a big revelation, nor will it impact the Qanon folks.
Yeah. It’s not likely Watkins was Q initially, but there’s a decent chance he is now.
He most likely bought the "account" from the second/third Q (depending on how you do the counting), who is still unknown.
No, they don't. Just the tripcode, which is why I used quotes around account.
it still kinda throws me for a loop that the Q followers are able to ignore that basically every real name attached to this shit is linked to CP.
I dunno, but I wouldn't be surprised since Q started on 4chan's /pol/ which 8chan is an offshoot of (though Hotwheels, the original owner broke off from 4chan due to Gamergate being "suppressed"/deleted on /v/ there. I dunno about the new "owner" of 8chan).
That said, looking at your second tweet, the IP's are all the same for three different sites in the dig/nslookup for the DNS, which is pretty damning.
I honestly haven't paid attention to 8chan since like the first week or gamergate, and the only reason I paid attention to it was because (unlike 4chan) the source-code (4chan was futaba?) the imageboard "software"/source-code was available. I "nope"d out hard seeing how the place was gonna go, double-so with Gamergate.
In fact, I think the original 8chan code is still on Github.
I'm Q. Do you really think it's a coincidence that there's 5 letters in DeJoy's name?
from day 1 Q refused any type of cryptography to prove their identity. No crypto wallet, no pgp key. The only person who can reliably be considered Q are the people who owned and operated the sites Q posted on. That's the key to the conundrum.
