This is a truly incredible article that criticizes China's plans to build high speed rail to under-served parts of China by taking the angle that it won't make money, and therefore is stupid. Amazing that infrastructure projects that help rural Chinese gain access to a high speed rail network is criticized from the angle of profit-making when making a profit is never the point with infrastructure projects. The NYC subway system wasn't built to "make a profit," but that doesn't mean it was a bad idea. But China bad so somehow them building a crazy amount of high speed rail is bad.
This momo's argument is that instead of investing in rail, China should instead encourage people to move to the biggest cities. Because what China needs is an even denser concentration of the population into the largest cities.
Moving to cities not prepared to handle the increase in density would lead to poor living conditions, poverty, improper sanitation, crime, and unrest. They are basically giving them bad advice.
Imagined if your doctor hated you and told that the gangrenous limb doesn't need amputation. And you took their advice.
Can you imagine how western nations would frame that if China actually did take their terrible advice? Authoritarian China forces mass emigration of rural population would make headlines for months. Then no doubt they'd call the now worse off cities "open aired prisons" and then continue to never report on Palestine.
Also just compare France and Germany, classic scenario
Paris, the nation, surrounded by farmland?
or a bunch of medium-large cities evenly dispersed throughout the nation
which one is economically superior?
But number goes up, you see
Won’t anyone please think of the EPS
China understands reality, Anglos don't
If you build it, they will come. You build railways into the rural West and more people will go there, and it will eventually increase business and population in those areas.
Also it has the pleasant side effect of making the Chinese population harder to nuke down.