Look at all these identical articles, many are Reuters sourced, but all of them are quite literally copy and paste the entire state department write ups that Im sure they were instructed to personalize first. Lazy fuckers lol
Reuters US News Yahoo Axios EurActiv DW
Im sure all the rest are the same, but nevertheless... cope and seeeeethe
:fedposting: This just proves that the UN has been captured by Chinese imperial interests.
seen by observers as a setback to both accountability efforts and the West's moral authority
:tito-laugh:
nooo not our moral authority :wojak-nooo:
setback to both accountability efforts and the West’s moral authority
:yes-comm: Good
I'm sure the US would help them rebuild, provided Ukraine just handed over whatever natural resources they've got and privatized everything that isn't already
It would be funny despite the west giving Ukraine loads and loads of weapons they end up closer with China.
zelensky is gonna need to treat nazis the way westerners think china treats uyghurs if he wants to live more than a year after the war ends.
China has been trying to maintain good relations with Ukraine, even throughout the war. A recent statement from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the PRC: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/202209/t20220924_10770931.html
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba after meeting China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi:
My counterpart reaffirmed China’s respect for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, as well as its rejection of the use of force as a means of resolving differences
According to Zelensky back in May regarding the war:
China has chosen the policy of staying away. At the moment, Ukraine is satisfied with this policy. It is better than helping the Russian Federation in any case. And I want to believe that China will not pursue another policy. We are satisfied with this status quo, to be honest
China has also been Ukraine's top trading partner and largest recipient of Ukrainian weapons in recent years. Ukraine was second only to Russia as an arms exporter to China. Before the war, Ukraine was China's top corn supplier and China was also the top importer of Ukrainian iron ore, barley, vegetable oils, and jet turbine engines.
Ukraine joined the BRI and was expected to become a key partner. China still has large infrastructure projects underway in Ukraine. Zelensky said that he hoped that Ukraine would become “a bridge to Europe for Chinese business.”
Love how reddit's response to zero muslim countries going along with this vote is just to enforce the racist "dumb savages" trope and say they sold out their fellow muslims, instead of questioning exactly why no muslim country buys this narrative in the first place
their response is literally just "anyone siding with China has been bought out by China" with literally 0 reflection on the inverse of that
During the cold war, the anticommunist ideological framework could transform any data about existing communist societies into hostile evidence. If the Soviets refused to negotiate a point, they were intransigent and belligerent; if they appeared willing to make concessions, this was but a skillful ploy to put us off our guard. By opposing arms limitations, they would have demonstrated their aggressive intent; but when in fact they supported most armament treaties, it was because they were mendacious and manipulative. If the churches in the USSR were empty, this demonstrated that religion was suppressed; but if the churches were full, this meant the people were rejecting the regime’s atheistic ideology. If the workers went on strike (as happened on infrequent occasions), this was evidence of their alienation from the collectivist system; if they didn’t go on strike, this was because they were intimidated and lacked freedom. A scarcity of consumer goods demonstrated the failure of the economic system; an improvement in consumer supplies meant only that the leaders were attempting to placate a restive population and so maintain a firmer hold over them. If communists in the United States played an important role struggling for the rights of workers, the poor, African-Americans, women, and others, this was only their guileful way of gathering support among disfranchised groups and gaining power for themselves. How one gained power by fighting for the rights of powerless groups was never explained. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy, so assiduously marketed by the ruling interests that it affected people across the entire political spectrum. :parenti::parenti: :parenti::parenti::parenti:
why should we expect indonesia or morocco or wherever else to care? it's not like they have big uyghur populations and I don't expect germans to give much of a shit about christians in oman.
Well Uzbekistan has the second most Uyghurs (after China), and Kazakhstan is also central Asia Muslim country, but they both voted no (not just abstain).
They often vote to condemn Israeli treatment of Palestinians. So (if one believes Xinjiang is being ethnically cleansed), you'd think they'd vote to condemn China's treatment of Uyghurs.
Since no Muslim countries are voting to condemn China, westerners need some explanation other than the simple explanation that the reports of abuse in XJ are greatly exaggerated.
The defeat (19 against, 17 for, 11 abstentions) is only the second time in the council's 16-year history that a motion has been rejected and is seen by observers as a setback to both accountability efforts and the West's moral authority.
:michael-laugh:
Even India doesn't want to get their name stain in this shite. China soft power at work
I think India tries to stay neutral in these kind of things. So even if it has better relations with the West than China they're not going to follow the West's messaging
top comment lmao
China’s ambassador had warned shortly before the vote that the motion would create a “dangerous shortcut” for examining other countries’ human rights records.
Good, we need to start examining human rights abuses everywhere and put a stop to it all. I don't care what country is investigated.
Bro 'human rights abuses' are used as casus belli against a country, the USA invades them and makes it worse, and then they just keep doing that again and again forever
Redditors really can't think about history or anything, 100% just stuck in a psychopathic hivemind that perpetuates the worst of imperialism under the auspices of 'good vibes'
I don’t care what country is investigated.
Same person saying this would be shitting their pants if China motioned to investigate the US for any of its long list of crimes against humanity lol
Death to America
if China motioned to investigate the US
Not quite, but close :xigma-male:
That line was definitely a nod to the West, US probably specifically lol
Don't know how someone could be so thick they can't see that
The article say
"Today China is targeted. Tomorrow any other developing country will be targeted," said Chen Xu
Expecting Redditors to remember that the US still has kids in cages
Hasn't been a good week for redditors and their bot. Got slap by OPEC+, now the global south do the slapping
I wish I didn't go there because every single comment makes me so angry, I'm so fully of hate for all of these people
If it helps, at least 20% are bots and another 30-40% are just people with wet clay for brains who will carry the contours of whatever last imprinted on them and could probably be made to say based shit after like 3 good conversations with any of us.
another 30-40% are just people with wet clay for brains who will carry the contours of whatever last imprinted on them and could probably be made to say based shit after like 3 good conversations with any of us.
how are there people like this
The CIA spent a lot of time and money to engineer a society full of people like that
Lmao of course the US, UK, and Canada were the ones to push this.
I love to set the international community growing tired of the west's bullshit.
once the USA collapses (finally) the americans won't learn a fucking thing. They'll just huff copium and do revisionism like the confederates and the nazis before them. They'll say the problem is that the evil world stood against the one freedom loving country or some bullshit like that.
They'll learn a thing but it will take a very long time and very bad things will happen first
I'd say it will be more like Rhodesia stans. Confederate apologists deny the war was about slavery, and neonazis deny the Holocaust. Rhodesia supporters fully acknowledge and support the apartheid past.
neonazis deny the Holocaust
Denying the holocaust is something only some of them do. Plenty of them, dare I say even the majority of them, admit it happened and think it was "Based."
Confederate apologists deny the war was about slavery
Again, only some of them. Even then, barely. They say it was about "State's Rights." Which begs the response "States Rights to Own Slaves." Then you point at the secession documents and quotes from their officials and they usually at that point either stop responding or call you a slur.
Rhodesia supporters fully acknowledge and support the apartheid past.
So do nazis and confederate apologists. The era of American history most analogous to South African Apartheid, i.e. segregation, came after emancipation. All those lost causer confederate apologists absolutely will be open about supporting "
separate but """equal"""" segregation even if they deny the war was about slavery. And nazis, whether they deny the holocaust, or claim it was "based", they advocate "racially homogenous ethnostates" and deportation of ethnic minorities, religious minorities, immigrants, etc. In fact, the holocaust-denying nazis will usually cope by saying that Hitler "only deported" Jews. Which means they support deportation of people they don't like, whether legal or undocumented. That's apartheid, comrade. That's segregation.I was more referring to rhetoric they use. Of course Nazis like genocide, they wouldn't be Nazis if they didn't. I'm just referring to how those groups try to rehabilitate the image of the genocidal regime they support in their propaganda. They don't start off radicalizing people to fascism by saying "yeah we like genocide", they lead into that.
I'm just pointing out that the Rhodesia wankers and the Nazi wankers are both bad at keeping the mask on
Yeah guess the Rhodesia fash doesn't even have to try to be mask on because anyone caring about Rhodesia is fash-adjacent already
The real international community has had enough of the lib "international community"'s shit
Information the CIA Uyghur person claims is presented as fact. Would love to see claims that Venezuela or Cuba make about the US given that treatment.
the maoist uprising against the landlords was the largest and most comprehensive proletarian revolution in history, and led to almost totally-equal redistribution of land among the peasantry
